<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/109/172/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/109/172/001

Revision as of 20:15, 14 February 2021 by RyanGilkes (talk | contribs) (Protected "JB/109/172/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)))
Completed

Click Here To Edit

(11)

immediately to abolish the system which he had so
strongly reprobated. He might fail in the attempt;
his successor might fail in the attempt, but ultimately
he was persuaded that that important object would
be accomplished. In was by a steady and implausible adherence
to constitutional principles that England
had attained to her present prosperity; and by pursuing
a similar course, he hoped that Ireland would
share the advantage.
It was on these grounds, that
he most respectfully, but most firmly oppose such
propositions as that under consideration. He was not
so rash or so foolish as to say that there would be no
more disturbances in Ireland, but he would say, that
come when they might, they ought to be met on the
principles of the Constitution. A sudden emergency
might require a temporary remedy; but whenever
the great features of the law by which Ireland was governed,
differed from those of the law by which England
was governed he could not but consider that difference
as a departure from justice and wisdom. (The
Right Honourable Gentleman sat down amidst
loud and general cheers.)

Mr Dawson supported the necessity for inquiry.
When an honourable Member for Ireland had described
so strongly the aids which existed in that unhappy
country, the House ought to listen to him. If
Government would not support the Gentlemen of
Ireland, they must not expect their support.

Mr. W. Parnell, opposed the motion. Ireland
generally speaking was quite tranquil. The recent
disturbances in Galway had been suppressed by the
existing law. Why call for more vigourous measures?

Mr W. Pole argued at considerable length to the
same effect as his Right Hon. Friend (Mr C. Grant.)

Mr V. Fitzgerald, maintained the expediency
of the proposed inquiry, although it appeared to be
resisted by the combined parties of in the House. His
Right Hon. Friend who had made such an impression
on the House by his eloquence had said that
it



Identifier: | JB/109/172/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 109.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

109

Main Headings

Parliamentary Reform

Folio number

172

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Collectanea

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C11

Penner

Watermarks

C WILMOTT 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andreas Louriottis

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

ID Number

35827

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in