★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1823 May 22 + L G 2 1827 Feb. 23 sum Constitutional Code
III R Ch. XII Judiciary Collectively §.29. Located here 29. Not by Executive Chief Not by Prime Minister Not by Constitution
2
1 Location of why not in Constitution, nor Legislative, nor Executive, but in Justice Ministry?
Ratiocination
Art. 5. Question. Why locate as to the function of locating all the several Judges in their respective Offices official situations locate it not in the hands of a single funct the members of the supreme Constitution of the those people in whose hands the function of locating the possessors of the supreme legislative authority is located but and why then of a single functionary himself one and the same functions for all located by the Executive Chief Supreme in the Executive Department?
2 Answer. Reasons 1. in Constitution 1. Want of time: as is case of Executive Chief.
Answer. Reasons. 1. First as to the not locating it in the hands of the supreme Constitution.
1 Want of time: namely for receiving adequate information: as in the case of the function of Executive Chief.
1. Consider the member for in the first place as the gr As to appropriate moral aptitude
That with relation to the choice location of the members of the supreme legislature the here proposed members of the supreme Constitution are not unapt but on the other hand contrary in an exclusive degree apt, has been already . But to the case of the class of functionaries here in question namely the Judges of the several Judicatories this same appropriate moral aptitude does not extend. To the Of locating seating in the supreme Legislature a majority in the breasts of whom in addition to the the disposition to make to his happiness sacrifice of the happiness of the greatest number in the breast of his own member of the supreme Constitutive can the hope of have place. But of locating in the situation of Judge a single individual in whose breast in addition to the power the disposition to make to a consider degree more or less considerable this sacrifice may without much difficulty have place. By the This is that inducement points of appropriate aptitude of which he has succeeded in putting himself in possession and of which he has had the opportunity of making adequate display this is that individual has obtained at the hands of the majority of the Electors that degree of confidence by which that for the in regard to the location of an individual in the office in question they would the majority of them be guided in their votes by this office his declared opinion. They would regard as being the relation to the situation the individual possessed of the maximum of appropriate aptitude taken in the aggregate, the individual, whatever he were, who by this their chosen shall have been pointed to us being the very individual so universally desired:
Identifier: | JB/042/579/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-05-22 |
1-3 |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
579 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
ratiocinative |
||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d2 / e2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
13502 |
|||