<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/037/046/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/037/046/001

Revision as of 23:45, 14 July 2021 by David (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit 1821. May 2d
First Lines Penal Law
,
(1.)

To the vocabulary of tyranny, belongs the word mercy. The idea expressed by this word is a sort of appendage to, and antagonizes with, the idea designated by the word justice. The word justice, as but commonly employed, matches with the word deserving as applied to punishment: in this sense, penal justice is exercised by the application of punishment on the occasion of which, and in the quantity in which, it is deserved in this case, if mercy be exercised, it is in opposition to, and at the expense of, justice: insofar as mercy is exercised, justice is not done. What in this as in every case the greatest happiness of the greatest number requires, is – that if on the occasion in question, application of the punishment in question would be conducive to that greatest happiness the punishment should be applied; if not, not: if, in either case, justice is administered, no such thing as mercy is exercised in either case. Under a government which has, for its actual end, the greatest happiness of the greatest number, thus it is that mercy is unknown. Mercy unknown – and why? Only because her name is unknown. Under a representative democracy – under the government of the Anglo American United states for instance, mercy is unknown on at least might be to great advantage and therefore ought to be unknown. Under that government, for a functionary as such to stand up on any occasion and to say, – I will, on this occasion, show mercy, would be as much as to say – the power of a tyrant is in my hands, but, on this occasion, I will not exercise it. The surgeon, when it appears to him that it would be for the greatest happiness of the individual under his care that one of the patient's legs should be cut off, does not say – I will do justice upon this leg? Has little, if it appears to him that, without cutting off the leg, a cure may be effected, does he say, I will show mercy to this leg?



This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet




Identifier: | JB/037/046/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 37.

Date_1

1821-05-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

037

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

046

Info in main headings field

first lines

Image

001

Titles

[[titles::misdecision necessary[?] - mercy, distributive]]

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

11261

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in