★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1824. Decr. 16 1825 Decr. 20. Procedure Code
Ch. XXVI. Local Headmen Registrars §. Uncommissioned prehension warranting
2
4 Art. 4. Under the Code should the Headman omitt the day, the next complaint would go to the cation and the delinquent would be made to make c for loss of time &c.
Under the here proposed Code, the Headman if applied to would he d this to his sport of time and justice? The next That day or the next the would repair to the Immediate Judicature, and that day or the next the delinquent would be called before it, and obliged to make compensation to the applicant for his loss of time. On the occasion of the suit this application no pecuniary pence to either none.
5 Art. 5. In England for any such complaint complainers would be made to per or so for the attempt in cash before hand, and would obtain in redress In the only Judicatory as well might the delinquent might well be Judge be Judge with Judge Punishment none, but on proof of corruption which is the use of the 1. as if without it no mischievous misconduct could have place. 2. if he has conscience since, existing it can soever be proved. 3. His station he discover of being convicted, the Judge would not suffer it. 4. He is in a community of sinister interest with all Judge the Judge will legislature.
In England are a the man ill enough advised to the attempt to call the wilfully scornfully negligent functionary to account would cost the party thus injured a hundred pound or so, and so he made it, it would be abortion. One Judicatory alone is there at in which it could be made, and it might as well be made in the Judicatory in which the delinquent was himself sit Judge as in that. Gentlemen who serve their King and Country in this capacity for nothing are not to be horrified by frivolous accusation in no corrupt here so much is imputed much less proved. W Gentlemen such as these punish witness corrupt actions: and impute to them exempt and that any such motive should be imputed to them is not to be endorsed. Such his such will always be the language of any Ld Chief Justice. Suppose by way of a f a Gentleman of this class dis of seeing himself punished for corrupt motives: would he be able to succeed? the how will so ever odds would be against him the success of it. What Would he be indulged on any such whim? Not he indeed. The character of his Majesty's Government is at stake: that must be preserved at any rate. Yes, and in any securing them accordingly is it preserved.
|
Identifier: | JB/042/810/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-12-16 |
4-5 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
810 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
13733 |
|||
