JB/078/009/002

Click Here To Edit

1826. Octr 25.
Review of Humphreys.
Ch. Formula
1 All topics
i. , Reasons
II. Topics, Reasons 4*
H. should in his samples
housed have made
references to the relative ma
in his Code. I. Same ideas, same words

1. Result of comparison
of all three Draughts.
1. Rule. 1. Eadem natura
eadem nomenclatura,
violated.

2.
Reasons for observance
1. For all repetitions, one
labour of attention
serves in all writers and
readers.
2. So, one reference.
3. Obviated the obscurity
and ambiguity
from difference of expression,
where identity
of import is intended;
diversity being thus declared,
where diversity
is intended, no other
mode is there than this
for expressing it.

3.
Of this, H. is not aware

4.
Rule II. For giving instruction
relative to
the particulars of a
legal instrument, give
the in general
terms to serve as rules.
The examples suffice
not of themselves.

5.
1. Only in so far as
the aptly frames to himself
the rule, will the
intended individual
copyist be able to conform
to it. Giving the
rule, the Legislator
saves all this labour
and the danger of aberration.

Identifier: | JB/078/009/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.
Date_1	1826-10-25	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-6, 1-7, or 1, 2-6, or 7 - or 8, 9-10, or 11 - or 12
Box	078	Main Headings	Review of Humphreys
Folio number	009	Info in main headings field	Review of Humphreys
Image	002	Titles
Category	Marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks	J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	Jonathan Blenman
Corrections	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	25100
Box Contents