★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1826 Nov. 12
Review of Humphreys
D
Ch Agenda
(1) 1 J.B.: Procedure Code
responsibility is not present in case of perjury
under but as now only
as well as punishment; in my above, the
applicant when constituted before as well as after he is admitted
plaintiff is , the proposed defendant — or seen
as constituted defendant, if as if he was not to present
a of his say what they have to say one way sent questions
as are put to them by or by him is the Judge, and whatever they
say is mounted. there Down goes the whole fibre of Special
pleading: down goes the whole fibre of inequity called equity
procedure: <del. If circumstance rending it a party forbidding
is a a catnip, litigant
or un-litigant for my Code knows no distinction the proposed
examinee can not be made to at the judicatory in which
the has it command with as in Equity
he is in the epistolary mode — if
in the judicatory of the which he has a residence his residence is
if the question with the correspondent is to a degree
simple epistolary is to a — the a
is the , the epistolary mode may the purpose
as the oral: if to a certain degree , the would
be at lengthy and too to erase: and but
oral interrogation with question arising out of the answer will be
accepted/advanced as adequate to the purpose the of the , Lord Eldon some the </gap/>
of to be
drop in a finite to his View, will when it
for more with after his
from . case day to serve him up a
the and the degree are the with the and extraneous <lb?>in of bill in what degree and
.
Special Pleading and Equity practice — what were they —
what have they ever been but a scheme for picking ,
or rather for robbery on pretence of rendering justice?
in
all over the country,
as no —
1 a but
<note>Was ever House of
Commons Committee
enough to employ either [both] the Common Law Special
Pleading or General pleading
or the Equity or
procedure forms at a
of its endeavours to appropriate
the necessary information [with a view
to legislation?] The
as well adapted to
Legislative purposes are
those forms as they are to the
purpose of judicature
What has the obtainment
of appropriate information<lb?>is the proper object in either
case? So as in the
nature of things, that for the obtainment of one and the same information approbation, correct as correct and compleat as possible and so far as may be compleat, one mode of procedure should to the best
when it is sought for one purpose, when sought for the other purpose
a totally one? [+]
[+] How long will ages combine to be
that against so important
so obvious, and so incombustible?
Identifier: | JB/078/146/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-11-12 |
|||
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
146 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
C1 / E1 |
||
25237 |
|||