JB/078/117/001

Click Here To Edit

1826. Octr. 20
Review of Humphreys

L
§§, Observations miscellaneous
(1) § Genealogical Succession
Partition or non-partition!

Objection to equal
partition

To the system of equal partition the danger of destruction
in value by reduction to unable parts were in the objective
opposed by Mr. H. was the fear of a peremptory one
and of one in the comparatively consensual system of procedure
which ahs place in French law would begore the decree
at an end suffer to cut up the value, how much easier would
it be up by the exactly English on which is several
times as extensive?

Answer. Before it arrived at this length the consequence
would be individual interest operative in the strongest degree would
stop it: no price but here and there a madman would profer
its made a of the whole order here as among
the rest. No. it would come under the : and is
expected and thence bidders would be so much more unseen
are here than in France, the to give that distinction<lb?>to it would so the earlier act.

Then as to expence of procedure, so long as it
it might be a fatal one: but as the lawyer class though be
so much a strong as is the strongest the
and length being still stronger, the the
a degree of in the expence still that which
has place in is in the nature of the case and would
be into effect.

Identifier: | JB/078/117/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.
Date_1	1826-10-20	Marginal Summary Numbering	Not numbered
Box	078	Main Headings	Review of Humphreys
Folio number	117	Info in main headings field	Review of Humphreys
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C1
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25208
Box Contents