★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1825 Nov. 14 Constitutional Code
1o Ch. XII. Judiciary collectively §.16. Partiality obviated In functions
Reported?
As to the question are you or are you not in the relative situation in question — it to the question the objection of its being a question calling for a self-accusing answer does not apply to it: for in the being in any such situation there is no blame. In this way no objection applies but that by which the indecision is brought to view: and this would of itself would be pronounced abundantly
If in the case of any one a Judge of the substitute grade to find any such question would be indecorous, be put put to any suit high functionaries as this in Westminster Hall superordinates or to Court pf King's Bench or any of those other superiors in Westminster Hall and be still shockingly and revoltingly indecorous.
If so what it be if put to the superordinates of these same subordinates, the Members of the House of Lords? Insanity not indecorum would be cordially imputed to the author of any suit proposition, not indecorum to the proposition itself
It would not only be indecorous: but it would be useless: for being by situation impeccable, they are of course by the in virtue of that same situation unpunishable Not but that in a certain way they are punishable: to wit impertinence his accusation preferred to the House of Commons to the House of Lords. But this to impeccability is but nominal: for c the accuser there is but one day, and in the year: and that is that of the Great Ealands
This by so simple an assumption all dissenters or remain way become — right, and may this is as it should be
|
Identifier: | JB/042/371/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-11-14 |
|||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
371 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"superseded?" [note in jb's hand]]] |
13294 |
||
