JB/042/489/001

Click Here To Edit

1825 Nov. 10

+ + 2o<note>
Copied <note><sic>Ch.<sic> XII Judiciary collectively
(6) (7) or (2) (2 §.18 19. 20. 21
Instructions

I §. Conflicting interpretation respecting function §.18.2. eventually-emendative
function §.19.

With whatsoever skill, endeavoured to be excluded, uncertainties, respecting what
on the occasion in question was the desire and will of the Legislator will
in every part of the law, people in a body
be liable to present themselves: To to one man the passage in
question will present more than one; there is the case of multiples to another
no determinate sense at all: this is the case of obscurity,
as between individual and individual to see the passage one man and another, a passage which presents
no question with to both a determinate sense, will present to the one no sense, to the other a different
and repugnant sense. So Thus it may be, as between individual
and individual before suit commenced so <gap/ thus it may be as between
individual and individual after suit : so thus it may
be as between either individual and Judge after suit commenced and
termination: between Judge Immediate and Judge Appellate
on the occasion of the same suit: between Judge Immediate
and Judge Appellate or between Judge Appellate and Judge Appellate on the occasion of two different suits, in
which have been through the times and places at which they have had place have
been different</add>
having place at different times and places between the two
different parties the import of the one and the same passage in the law coming in has come
in question on these different occasions.

Under the existing systems all these doubts, disagreements,
with the</add> uncertainties or disappointments with which they are pregnant
have been and are
in countless multitudes continually
accumulating, without any thing done for the revival
or limitation of the disclosure mass, under the
here proposed system they will be removed as fast as they
come into existence.

If in the in question the cause source
in the opinion of the Judge, his lies purely in a want of
deficiency in respect of discernment or judgment on the
part of a suitor or the suitors, on one or both sides of a
suit actually commenced — all of it in that quarter — none in
any unaptness of expression, it will be a case for the exercise
of his interpretation,
without any exercise given to his eventually
emendative function,
as above described:
if

Identifier: | JB/042/489/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.
Date_1	1825-11-10	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	042	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	489	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c6 or c2 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals		Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public	"copd"	ID Number	13412
Box Contents