JB/034/121/001

Click Here To Edit

1823. August 25
Constitutional Code

Give here for or

To Under this system, with what prospect of success could
a Judge pronounce a judgm a sentence or a conviction which
in his own eyes were unjust? Altogether unavailing would
any such act be in opposition than that of its passing without
opposition through the censorship of the Quasi Jury, and after
moreover receiving and finding a congeniality of conjunct guilt in the Appellate
Judicatory.

Meantime the act being in the eyes even of the Agent
itself flagrantly palpably unjust, is it possible can it in the nature of things that it should wear
a more favorable aspect not only in the eyes not only of observers
altogether impartial, but of persons leagued men by a
community of interest self-regarding and sympathetic
with the supposed objects of the intended undiluted injury?

Identifier: | JB/034/121/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.
Date_1	1823-08-25	Marginal Summary Numbering	or 25 - or 28
Box	034	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	121	Info in main headings field	constitutional code
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2 / d13
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1822
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	admiral pavel chichagov
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1822
Notes public		ID Number	10395
Box Contents