★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
1823. Sept. 10
Constitutional Code
Ch Quasi Jury
Explicaty Observation
Adopted features
Continued from the f first paragraphs of the commetion
the former plan
In the case of the here proposed Quasi Jury the
influence ifnow possessed by the Jury is lessened in one direction,
augmented in another
5 or 1
design here
1. Adopt apt Jury
features
2. Disused unapt do
3. Add apt new
In the case framing of the proposed Quasi Jury, the object here been
to retainadopt all the apt features of the Jury institution, and discarding used to discard
the unapt ones, and to add such apt new features as seemed could be found
to both forms conducers to the ends of justice in both cases, is at
any rate in the present case
6 or 2
Apt: viz as to Quasi
Jury: for one will be shewn which tho'
ally<add>essentially</add> apt in Jury, would a
Quasi Jury be any
[Add? This is one
power of a virtual negation
on laws with a
constitutional aspect.]
See below.]
By apt understand with reference to the here proposed institution:
for one feature will be brought to view to which the beneficial
effects of the Jury system will it is believed be seen to be in great measure
referab
le, but fromby which but if adopted into the here
proposed institution, no effects but evil ones could be produced.
Between the Jury system and the proposed Quasi Jury system
the principal difference lies in this; Under the Jury system By a Jury
powers are possessed and exercised such as to a great extent are decisive
of the ultimate fate of the suit: power of acquittal for example in
all criminal cases. For a Quasi-Jury no such decisive power
is allotted
Identifier: | JB/034/164/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-09-10 |
5 or 1 - 8 or 4 |
||
034 |
constitutional code |
||
164 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
b1 / c1 / d1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
c wilmott 1819 |
||
andreas louriottis |
|||
1819 |
|||
10438 |
|||