★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
1823 Sept.10
Constitutional Code
III
Ch. Quasi Jury
Explanaty Observation
1. Adopted features
3
In that case, the power of the Jury, though decisive is
not ultimately so: the ultimate decision resting on the
charge responsible. Appellate Judge, or in extraordinary
cases in the also effectually responsible Justice Minister
11 13 or 6
This decisive power being
with holden, now
but the condition, interrogative,
and commentative
left, the character
is little more than that
of an appointed Committee
of the Public
Opinion Tribunal constantly
present
With the the above exception instead of favouring the able
possessed by the Quasi Jury partakers more of that of a
Section of the Public Opinion Tribunal plan of that of a
body of commissioned and official Judicial functionaries.
But, if, upon the whole, it should appear, that a some of comissioned
Judge with with Quasi Jury each of the a Quasi Jury
for a a good for his moral aptitude upon his moral department, and an assistance
to been so in respect of his intellectual aptitude point a
favour present of genal rectitude of decision this is poss
persisted by a body of Judges associated with bodies of
Jurymen in the English State what the denomination denomduation is by
wh the charactercharacter they act in is designated, is of small of very
little importance.
Identifier: | JB/034/166/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-09-10 |
11 or 6 |
||
034 |
constitutional code |
||
166 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
b3 / c3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
10440 |
|||