<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/034/142/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/142/001

Revision as of 17:30, 16 January 2024 by Keithompson (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1823. SeptR 4

Constitutional Code III. Rationale
Aptitude Obs
§.1. Adoptive features

54
Cause why this shape
of evidence became almost exclusively
connected
Jury admitting
procedure. Even antecedently to its establishment:
viz. in saxon times the judicatory
was properties: members
of it all the fr of
the district: president
alone (Plst or Banlist)
nominum od Monarch,
or Sub-Monarch Baron


55
When this section of
the judicatory succeeded
to the nature, still there
being no money to Jury
Scribes, share no
scribes.


56
As the money came
in scribes leaped in in sea
interest with the
Judges come in. Under
the name of pleading
compounds of
absurdity aand ful




Identifier: | JB/034/142/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-09-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

54-57

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

142

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5 / c2 / d16 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1822

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

10416

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in