JB/004/161/001

Click Here To Edit

1830 July 26 Review

RE-enquiry Removal Per J.B.

Sole Exception where on account of conflictingness in the Evidence or magnitude of the mass a recapitulatory Enquiry before a Quanquiry judged necessary

Exception is — where an account of conflictingness between portion and portion in of the mass of evidence, on account in consideration of the magnitude of the mass, the supposed usefulness of bringing together the whole of it at one view, a recapitulatory Enquiry or say Examination is instituted by the Judge. In this case, and in this alone, the matter is submitted to the cognizance of a set of functionaries termed by him a Quasi-Jury who possess in common with the Judge all but the ten or a dozen elementary functions of which the Judicial function is composed: that one the imperative, being for the sake of responsibly reserved for the Judge alone. But all manner of means reductive of this number from 10 to 3, and vicinity of this a be to Justice Chamber, the burthen pressure of this species of burthen is, in his plan, minimized.

Identifier: | JB/004/161/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 4.
Date_1	1830-07-26	Marginal Summary Numbering	not numbered
Box	004	Main Headings	lord brougham displayed
Folio number	161	Info in main headings field	review
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	2082
Box Contents