JB/051/055/002

Click Here To Edit

13

1
Judicial proceedings
to be public
except &c. p.1

2
Districts ought to
be small. p.1

3
Parishes the lowest

4
Occasional attendance
can not be inconvenient
where habitual
attendance for
worship is not. p.1

5
Expence the sole
limit to the multiplication. p.1

6
To each district but
one Judge – if
two, better two districts. p.1

7
Inconveniences of
more Judges than
one. p.2
1. Encrease of expence
2. Encrease of delay
3. Diminution of responsibility
4. – of dependance on public opinion
5 – of obligation to attend
6 – of the restraint on corrupt non-attendance.

---page break---

7
1. What additional
intelligence may be
afforded by multiplication
of Judges
is not as the number. p.2

8
2. It is in most
cases needless. p.2

9
3. Where wanted it
may be had at a
cheaper by appeal.
p.2.

10
All that can be
expected from multiplicity
of Judges
is secured by publicity
of proceeding. p.2.

11
Multiplicity of Judges
contributes to probity
no otherwise than
by contributing to
publicity. p.2.

12
Universal competence

– Reasons p.3.
Special jurisdiction
would require either
1. a special Court
& thence additional
expence &c and
2. Uncertainty by
conflict of jurisdiction
– or
2. Remoter justice.

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/051/055/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 51.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	1-16, 1-10, 12, 13, 11, 11*, 14-17, 17a, 18-25
Box	051	Main Headings	evidence; procedure code
Folio number	055	Info in main headings field	judges number contents
Image	002	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer	benjamin constant
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	[[notes_public::"omit other side" [note in bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	16220
Box Contents