<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/055/321/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/321/001

Revision as of 10:19, 25 September 2024 by TB Editor (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826. April 13 May 19
Constitutional Code.Transcribed marginal wise
Transcribed from Marginals
Ch. IX. Ministers collectively
§. Statistic &c function
II. Journals Book
V. Occurrences.

Enactive

Art. 3. Evidence. Rule 1. Let no entry
be made without mention of the evidence on
which it is grounded.

At. 4. Rule 2. viz to wit the best obtainable evidence the
nature of the case admitts of.

Art. 3. Rule 3. Security for its correctness
this evidence should have the same as testimony
delivered before a Judge has.

Art. 4. Rule 4. Dependent on, thence Art. or 5. In respect of responsibility, compensational
non-visible as it be, to the nature of the subject matter of and punishment, in case of falshood especially
registration, will be the description of the appropriate wilful falshood, the security provided fo the correctness
and best, i.e. most appropriate of the evidence should not be the appropriate delivered evidence

2. So, with the sub-department and the office, the business in relation to an occurrence which is relevant and important
of which it registered. with relation to the business of any Sub department
of the Administration Department should not be
less than that which is provided in the case of evidence.
Art. 5. Properties
by deficiency in any one of which
a lot of evidence is
liable to be deceptious are
1. clearness; 2. correctness;
3. all-comprehensiveness,
or say compleatness.

Art. or 6. By The best obtainable evidence is
understand that which, being obtainable without preponderant
evil in the shape of delay vexation and expence,
is the most strongly probative – the least
likely to be incorrect or inadeqate deceptious whether deceptions.
by means of w

Art. 6. In the business of every Art. or 7. In the case of several of the
office will be kept having size and correspondent Sub-departments it ought to be, if without preponderant
and situation, in a separate Table, the Rules evil it can be made to be much greater. Reason – the
describing the mode and form of greater in respect of extent the magnitude of the loss liable
Art. 7. Evidence proper for the Inventory in those cases to be produced, with or without correspondent
declarations by him or those by whom, at the gain to profit to the inaudacious delinquent.

time of signature the contents have just been Art. or 8. Sub departments in relation to the business
inspected and perceptions of their existence and of which the demand for such extra security is most apt to be abundant
conditions obtainable. Co-inspection and attestations, are the following.
1. Army Sub department.
2. Navy Sub department.
3. Foreign Relations Sub department.
4. Trade Sub department.
For the mode of affording the security see Penal Act Code title Damnification and Fraudulent
<hi rend="underline"Obtainment</hi>. Aggravation, Semi publicity.


Identifier: | JB/055/321/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1826-05-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

321

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2 / D50 / E21

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

18042

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in