★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
1825. April 2
Copied Mgent
Apr. 17.
I or IV
Ch. IX.
S. defence how procurable
II.
III Judicators
III
Instructions Instructing?
Art.1. Between Judge and individual part the advantageousness of
operated upon by him, modes of cau
two - 1. mutual presence mode
2. mutual distance mode
2
Art. 2. On the mere difference between presence
and non protions for the most part
|
part the advantageousness of
the oral musical presence mode: to wit no
respect of the direct mode of justice
on the length of the distance turn
the proportionable advantage
ness of the epistolary mode:
to wit in respect of the collateral ends
because in case of distance
to bring about the
presence mode with its
advantages requires two
Art.1. Bet Judge
and individual ordinary modus
of
1.
journey with intervening
present the
demonstrating; with
correspondent delay: and
2. Interlocutors not
with expence and vexation
present signs prment
as a danage proposed
mode apartrary
to length of terms,
as a journey, to length of
time, and besides to length
distance.
3
Art.2 On distance
between
non presence,
and in case of new
-presence byon the length
of distance
chiefly the difference
as to clgilatates as a ness
3
Art 3. For the advantage
from presence
see Ch. VI. Jud. Appl
S. Urda oral. They
apply to both ends of
Justice Contiguity of
the individuals abide to
the Judges station was
there supposed. But,
of the advantages, cases reaching such converse or in large proportion deprived by the nature of changes.
Art 11. Whatsoever be the relation situation of the
individual pursuer defendant or witness for holdingcommencing
and maintaining intercourse with him there will be in every secure the two modes of
the oral and the bolary: courses by evanescent signs
converse by durable permanent signs.
4
Art.4. To contiguity substitute
distance, thereupon
to produce presence comes
need of journey by individual
to Justice Chamber:
maximum of length
not less than the earths
semicircumference,
with the addition produced
by nings and windings
In point of eligibility, relation law to for the purposes here in
question the difference forms upon the difference to have presence
and differencedistance<add>non-presence</add> in between the Judge and the individual
who for the purpose of the suit as in reasons prescribed
by him to hold converse with him.
Of the use advantage which resultingdesirable from the stance
of mutual pursuer the particular have been
brought to view. See Ch.VI Jud. Appl. They The advantage place with reference
to both ends of justice the direct and the collateral: they are
conducive to of decision, and
Identifier: | JB/055/101/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-04-02 |
1-4 |
||
055 |
Constitutional Code; Procedure Code |
||
101 |
Procedure Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
E1 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
17822 |
|||