★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1824 Nov
Procedure Code
Ch. Initiating application
§
4
Art. 4. Answer. No.
This would but ensure the
vexation, more than double
the expence, and division
for its effect, to a great
majority of the people;
as at present a denial of justice.
1. As to time: the time
of two men would be occupied
instead of one: of
the Judge's and the Attorney Lawyer's
instead of the Judge's alone
5
Art. 5. 2. As to expence, in
the character of lawyers
a man would requi have
greater payment than in
that of a Judge, or the
profession would not be
stocked profession.: the Judge is
partly held in pronounced
respect: the Lawyer, belonging
to the
profession, must be paid have
money in compensation for
disrespect
For the Attorney there is but that one paymaster: and the
poorer he is, the heavier is the burthen which a per the
payment of a given sum imposes on him. For a given
quantity of time — say a twelvemonths time a much less
remuneration in a pecuniary shape will suffice in the
case of the Judge than in the case of the Attorney: the
Judge being, no one can say in how large a proportion
before trial, paid in time and in natural dignity respect: the
Attorney being naturally an the object of the a
man of a different not to say opposite nature must
be paid to the full in money, and with somewhat
in addition to make up for what he whatever his
suffering may be in that shape.
8
Art. 8 In France, Judges
in great number, serve
for £50 a year each and
without reparation. In Bonaparte's Code. No man
there would, by the expectation
of so small a remuneration,
be be led to commence lawyer (a)
In France, fifty pounds a year without fees is a
salary for a Judge: and for that price Judges serve
there by hundreds and that without murmurs or reproach✝︎ ✝︎ ☞ Search Bonaparte's Code Codes to be sure those are as fees on their
part or suspicion of improbity on the part of the public.
6
Art. 6. By interest having the
in so far as he has the power, the Lawyer will be
led to add, to the quantum
of time necessary, time
in excess, that profit may
be proportionable.
7
Art. 7. The Judge has no
interest in such delay:
his interest tends to precipitation:
but to this
against this the checks provided
will be sufficient
The Attorney would have has an interest in protracting the conversation,
and in adjourning it from day to day. The Judge has
no such interest: the interest he has is a power would lead not to delay but
to precipitation.
But to d power has probity from failure on that side, the checks that have been , and in particular
of the surrounding audience in his own eyes.
The difficulty must therefore be either overcome or
doubled.
9
Art.9. If no person should apply
to a Judge without bringing [+] with him a danger, no person should be allowed to apply to a Physician, without bringing with him an Apothecary. ☞ Go to the last paragraph in the text.[+]2
Make a law that No person shall to approach the Judge
without bringing with him an Attorney? When you have made
a law for this make another, he saying that no person
without bringing with him an Apothecary, no man shall repair approach
to a Physician.
Note (a)
[+] Art. 9. Where sympathy for thinking boys was a factor, and
ingenuity was at work for succedaneums, one person proposed
a for a substitute with ropes to raise and lower it. Sympathy
still objecting, "Well then was the answer": "if you object to a
a couple of ducks. [+]
[+]The suffering would be instead be doubled: but the sufferers would be of less account in the hour-keepers books.
|
Identifier: | JB/055/179/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-11 |
4-9 |
||
|
055 |
Constitutional Code; Procedure Code |
||
|
179 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
C2 / D2 / E2 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
17900 |
|||
