JB/056/164/001

Click Here To Edit

1827. Octr. 17
Law Amendments +

2o
propositions
<add>§.5. Procedure

Arrest needless

20
Initiatory executions —
or securing sequestration, under
1 proposed system.
2 existing system

Now as to the mode of car commencement of a suit in a
case called a civil case, and the hardship imposed suffering
inflicted by any man at pleasure upon any man at pleasure
without any the smallest ground for it on the score of purpose

or 1
Under existing system
suffering inflicted at
pleasure on any man at
pleasure by mere exhibition <lb?>of affidavit evidence

On the single ground of the exhibition of an warrant in the shape
of affidavit evidence, without any more room left for counter warrant<lb/.even in that had on the other side, any more
matter to a person under the name of a person with no other relief than that of it
for another less effective or other tool more expensive under then name of a
— all this without any the smallest necessity

or 2 21
This under the idea
of security for eventual
execution in
case of adequate proof

This under the nature of security for execution in case of
adequate proof. But afflictive and inflated in this case is the suffering is
defective and is the bad security thus produced.
In the case where any such purpose can be found, more efficient and
at the same time less to the defendant would be a power,
supposing it gives a sufficient ground and with sufficient
against abuse or accident — a power of making personal sequestration<lb>of such property in the hands of justice by means of
subordinates as above.

or 3 22
Under proposed system
no provisional
sequestration without
ascertainment of the
necessity addition of
requisite countersecurity

Under the proposed system Never without the ascertainment of the necessary of the
matter of applicant with the addition of such security
as is deemed requisite would any such sort of security be afforded having power be considered<lb?>and where afforded, to property it would be as well
on a person as a better should be.

or 4 23
Under existing system<lb/power of oppression a man
<would have by swearing<lb?>a large debt against another
too large to admitt of his
finding bail — thus getting
him consigned to jail and
then leaving the country
for ever, when would
his victim be liberated?

Supposing a man thus disposed — a man whose
purpose was to elave the country for ever, he as propoerty in<lb?>by means of which he could be made to suffer what should hinder him
from swearing a debt to any amount at the charge of his an intended victim.
The debt being too large to admitt of his finding bail he gives to
he is consigned of course. And by when by what means will he
in this case be liberated. Of two of the one being
to each other suppose the man to take this course for the gratification of its
and having so done, to
take the course which
he had on other accounts
been his intention to take:
think of the situation is
the victim could be then left
The would be not how the country and its government for the and his accomplice?

Identifier: | JB/056/164/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.
Date_1	1827-10-17	Marginal Summary Numbering	20, or 1 - or 4
Box	056	Main Headings	Law Amendment
Folio number	164	Info in main headings field	Law Amendments
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C1
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals	George Bentham; Jeremy Bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	18220
Box Contents