<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/056/220/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/056/220/001

Revision as of 11:35, 5 August 2025 by Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
Ready for review. Submitted by Ohsoldgirl

Click Here To Edit

1827. Octr. Novr. 4
Law Amendment Constitutional Code

ult
Ch Propositions
Ch Procedure
§ After Application & Suits
Evidence elicitation
Existing System

6
Between correct &
incorrect veracious
& mendacious no
difference made

Correct or incorrect, mendacious or only incorrect
through mendacity, culpable misdirection or blameless error — successful
or unsuccessful the
no difference to the purpose
of the use of law is made by any of these circumstances
Not so whatever the chase after evidence be or be not attended with
success, or what penalty have the same purpose, the assertion
of it: that is to say the assurance given that the proposed witness
narrator or evidence holder will at the point when the time comes be its real owner.
For grown fallen out of all his every step he takes every word he speaks
or hears every word he writes and every word he
Had the Judge done as above his duty as the Judge lost to the partnership
would have been all these fees.

7
Under the proposed
system instrument
for obtaining attendance
for evidence
delivery a summons
or prehension as the
case may require.

8
Under existing
system subpoenas

Under the proposed system, as above, instrument of obtaining
attendance for delivery of evidence, a summons or a prehensive warrant
as the exigency of the case may require. Behold in Turn now to the
provided existing system in the and the instrument it employs employed by it
By a summons is made understood by every body what is intended
to be understood by it: by a prehensive warrant is understood
by every body what is meant to be understood by it: at any
rate when it is understood that for exclusion of ambiguity
the syllable ap is left off the word apprehension
is here as in latin left unapreceded by to the purpose
useless syllable ap. By True the existing system script of latin sub
poena
nothing by any man hand unimpregnated
with what in law goes by the name of larceny
can any thing be understood. Sub poena is made a penalty
under the terms of the same penalty what it is that is expected
to be done, as to this point it says nothing what is said is nothing.

On reading it looking into the parchment of sale to his
the afterighted between who never then paid in his life
never soever so much as has paid reads that by a able or
unable should at the commanded hour be found to be whom he is considered to be, a hundred
paid neither more or less will be the penalty to which be doomed
Will say to himself: no hundred pound have I to pay. Shall I then
go?. Yes, if it suits me: if not, not.



Identifier: | JB/056/220/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 56.

Date_1

1827-11-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-8

Box

056

Main Headings

Law Amendment

Folio number

220

Info in main headings field

Law Amendment

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C8 / C7 / E3?

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

George Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18276

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in