JB/116/001/001

Click Here To Edit

He observes - and with great truth - (3. IV. Ch.1) that if the crown
takes all every thing, there remains nothing for any body else. But
is it necessary or right, that where while private damage remains
uncompensatable, the Crown, or any bodyin the name of the
Crown should take every thing? The of this question
is what he found it much as- more convenient — to assume,
than to as it would have found it difficult to prove "As the public order (says he) is not otherwise avenged Comment. B.IV. Ch.1.
"than by forfeiture of life and property, it is impossible
"afterwards to make any reparation for the private
"wrong." — But is it necessary or right, that while damage
remains without reparation — injury, without redress — the
Crown, or any body in the name of the Crown, should King - that is 73 who has no damage — that is
it as 73 in the name of the King — should
take every thing — should swipe away the whole of that
fund from which reparation might have been afforded.
The affirmation was found as easy to assume, as it would
have been difficult to prove.

Identifier: | JB/116/001/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.
Date_1	1802-10-17	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	116	Main Headings	panopticon versus new south wales
Folio number	001	Info in main headings field	panopticon versus
Image	001	Titles	note to p. 54
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	1800
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1800
Notes public		ID Number	37534
Box Contents