★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
24 July 1802 N . S . Wales Conduct
34 III Non-exist. proved
If it had , nothing in the way of legislation would
from first to last have been done in English America
but by Parliament , or under the immediate eye of
Parliament : and the American war , with all its miseries ,
and all its waste of blood and treasure on both
sides would have been saved .
In In 1722 the time of the opinion given by Sir Clement
Wearg and Sir Philip Yorke , the view mens views of the matter
though not clear as above , was were yet considerably
improved . The distinction made in that
case is this . A Colony is obtained either by conquest
or without conquest : if obtained by conquest
the King may legislate over it without any consent,
expressly given by any of the inhabitants : if without
conquest , he can not without a consent expressly
given by a part of the inhabitants viz: whatever the majority of
part comes under the denomination of an assembly .
In the case submitted to laid before them for their opinion , the
right of the King to legislate over any Colony with
the consent of an Assembly of that Colony was not stated
as having been the subject of any dispute : it was therefore
a question that never called on their part for
consideration : if they decided on it , it was collaterally
and in fact without thinking it . With an assembly
they found the power legislation exercised by the King
in these colonies without Parliament in point of fact ,
and nobody suggesting a doubt about it , it was no business of
Identifier: | JB/116/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1802-07-24 |
|||
116 |
panopticon versus new south wales |
||
147 |
n. s. wales |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e4 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
37680 |
|||