<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/035/032/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/035/032/001

Revision as of 19:22, 10 July 2012 by JFoxe (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

Juries 3 Innate defects Objection Antidote not necessary when no danger of the disease Oh but says somebody, what matters it whether are they the worse
they have any or no when they have for having nothing to strengthen them against temptation
no improper ? The case of the rod of the law when they are not exposed to it? Where no infection
and of the public eye is to guard preserve men against can come, why look for antidotes? I answer —
corruption: but to a constitution which has as
infection proof of what use an antidote? why took for antidotes
not the seeds of the disease, which is incapable
of so much as receiving the infection, of what
can all the antidotes in the world be, and what
is it the course for art possessing them?



Identifier: | JB/035/032/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

035

Main Headings

constitutional code; evidence; procedure code

Folio number

032

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

floyd & co

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur young

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10625

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in