★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
1824. March 8 + +
Constitutional Code Ch.XV Quasi Jury
S.4 Inented
S.4 - treated Law
Art.2 Quasi-Jurors, Ordinaries and Selects together,
are thus treated: the list compound list, compounded of both,
being, formed in for Articles hereinsofar unimpared, formed, the Select arebut
takeninformed by selectionmade out of the compound list, much and of the
residue is compared the Ordinary list.
—
Art.3 For exemplification, in each set a certain number
say 156 is here must be supposed mostly sufficient to provide for the whole of the service
called for at thee hands of Quasi-Jurors , in the course of
the year. Deducting the 52 days of rest for the number of days
in which Quasi Jurors are unable to serve, 313 days: the number to be provided in and for each 3, the number sufficient in the service of that same number of 313 days
the year. For this purpose Term of service for each person suppose
six days. The six working days in the week of seven days: number of
Number of Quasi Jurors, in each at, three 3
Total number of Quasi Quasi-Jurors in the year, 52x3=156
When of - Selects,# one to a set 52
Ordinaries- two to a set - - - 104
—
Art.1. On this occasion as in every other the
end Art. 1. In the formation of this as of every other function
of the Judiciary establishment, leading principles are the
ends of justice; direct end maximization of rectitude of decision, otherwise or regularity
expressed, maximization of mischief; namely to the perjury
of the lengthsthe people members of the community at largein the character of eventual litigants
and in particular through partiality minimization (accordingly to their of one cause of misdecision
in particular: particularity: collateral end, minimization
of collateral evil in the cheaper of delay vexation and expenses
more particularly on the part of the such of the people, on whom is imposed
the obligation of serving in the capacity of Quasi-Jurors.
Except in the exercise of the Appeal function
The Among all of the the elementary judicial functions being the imperative
the Judges and though that alone being <add>with the single add> exception of the case of the appeal becoming </add> withholden from Quasi-Jurors, the danger of
misdecision through partiality in the part of the Quasi Jurors is
in proportion. lessened: thus it is that in all other cases minimization of the collateral evil, remains as in another
and for the principal object of regard.
---page break---
