JB/096/020/001

Click Here To Edit

under construction ...

The fame objections would lie against
making the law of Nature the foundation
of municipal Law: even supposing <add>allowing such a law to exist: & to be learnable in the manner our Author suppo supposes. For even he has allowed</add> with this additional
circumstance: that as it is not quite so
easy to define what is the law of Nature,
as it is to define what is we mean by the law of
Revelation: there would scarcely therefore remain
any no rule of obedience at all. For one man, might co-hesive would find one municipal law to be contrary
to his idea of the law of nature, and
another a second another: and therefore, according
to our Author's rule, no State could
enforce obedience to any. At all times, & among all men this inconvenience
would arise: that we must confound
two very different ideas: that which is
expedient Lawful, with and that which is Lawful expedient.

---page break---

Identifier: | JB/096/020/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	020	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles	note
Category	collectanea	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c53 / c54 / c55 / c56
Penner	168	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	31024
Box Contents