JB/096/004/003

Click Here To Edit

not necessarily included; & and supposing the definition to
have been just (which it is not) supposing it not to
have mistaken the foundation of Law. For the
the Law itself what followed woned have been

consistent enough. But it was a strange attempt
indeed to back these inferences to our Author's defini-
-tion of Law. _ To make God for instance+ pres- + Vol. 1 p.B of
-scribe Laws W-himself: that is, be at once his own Supe-
:rior & Inferior; has questionable reading & Man; _ To make Slaves feel
obligation; or to tie make man choose without choice;
will without volition._

paragraph

The design of the Commentaries our author is to methodise
& explain" a science which had been hitherto beenbut
little cultivated. _ Quod dedit principium udeniens?_
I shall leave the reader to answer this question. The
Ancients too were fond of talking of Horace too was of old talked much abouttheir heiduscodo.
And yet it was reserved to a great Genius of the present Foudown to discover
Age to discover, 1800 years afterwards that there was any order at all, in
the very book where this phrase occurs. The he recommends it._ Perhaps our learned
Commentator may one day meet with us able a friend.
At He seems to be a great Admirer of the Anerents; Sonth and
9
---page break---

Identifier: | JB/096/004/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	096	Main Headings	comment on the commentaries
Folio number	004	Info in main headings field
Image	003	Titles
Category	collectanea	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c7 / c8 / c9 / c10
Penner	168	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]	ID Number	31008
Box Contents