★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Note to Sect. II.
note to be added at the end of Sect. ii
To be copied Montesquieu as we have seen above was happier than
our Author in fixing with precision what he meant
by a State of Nature: & determining He determines it to be, what
it must mean in every treatise on Jurisprudence,
that State which is antecedent to one entrance into
Society. He has another advantage over our Author,
he saw better than he <unclear>said</unclear> he had a better notion of the actions, to which
the desire of happiness imprest upon us by our Creator,
would lead us a Man in his individual unconnected
State: He was not observe observed enough to did not talk of a
man's living honestly & giving to every man his
due in such a state, because he knew that the
idea of honesty & property could not exist previous
to a State of Society: but he "La paix (says
Esprit des Loïx. Liv. I. C.II. — "he) servit la premiere loi naturelle: une autre
"loi naturelle servit celle qui lui ins piscroit
"dechenter à se nourrir: La priere naturelle
"servit que les ledes se font l'une à L'autre
"servit une trisieme loi naturelle: le desir
devivre en Societè est la quatrieme loi naturelles."
And if any thing could with propriety
be called Law, which has not been formally
promulged, & in a manner perseptible to our
external sense these might be allowed to be
called the laws of Nature. And here the Codes of
Nature must end, because here the State of
Nature must cease —
Nature
9 35
Identifier: | JB/096/013/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
013 |
|||
001 |
|||
collectanea |
1 |
||
recto |
c35 |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown]]] |
||
[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31017 |
||