<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/096/130/001</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/096/130/001

Revision as of 17:00, 5 December 2010 by Diane Folan (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit


under construction ...


If he abstains from taking the pleasure in question
as we suppose him to do, it is I suppose on the four
accounts following, some or all of them.
1st Because he thinks God would may be displeased
with him.
2. Because he thinks the Law might may punish him
3. Because he thinks he may lose the esteem
and good-will of his acquaintance.
4. Because he thinks he may lose to the good-will
of his wife herself.

To each every one of these events, pain is or at least
may naturally ++ does probably appear to him to be annexed: and that
a pain originating ultimately in the body.

If the 1st of these be the consideration that
governed him, it is plain that the pleasure
he finds in fulfilling his duty in this behalf
is not consists not in the bare reflection that he is fulfilling

---page break---
his duty, but in the reflection his reflecting on the pains
he avoids by not violating it: viz: such
pains whether in the world or in the next,
that he might apprehend from the displeasure
of the Deity, at the same time that he
reflects on the pleasures that he secures; by such a conduct ++ will secure him. viz:
such pleasures as he expects from the favour
of the Deity. Another observation have it might might here be made. be the to observe others If the pains to a man has to apprehend from the displeasure of the Deity are not pains of the body; they are as the Scriptures seem to intimate, they are at least pains, which men could have no notion of, nor therefore be influenced by, if it were not for the pains of the body.

If it be the 2dcond that governed him, it is
plain according to our authors own account
that the pleasure he enjoys is a pleasure origindating in the body: for the pleasure
of thinking that he exempts himself from
the pains inflicted by the Law. Now all
these pains are without dispute referable
to the body.

If it be either the 3d or 4th, it is the pleasure
of & reflecting that he has escaped a
pain: the pain of forfeiting the esteem; & the or

---page break---
if another word pleases better the good will of those about him. Now what is it that esteem is good for? is it good of itself,+ or for something it procures? That it is good of itself, one may allow him after he has told us how much pleasure a man would find in the esteem of a set of beings he had neither good nor harm to apprehend from; the inhabitants of Saturn for example (supposing there are any) or the inhabitants of a drop or two of stale vinegar?

If I ask him what riches or power are good for, he agrees with us, and has his answer ready - he [...?] that they afford pleasure in virtue of the physical enjoyments of which they are /may procure him/ the pledges and the physical sufferances against which they are /may ensure him/ a defence. to these objects at least, he says it is but too common for men to refer exclusively the benfits of these means as he calls them their riches and their power. They are
---page break---
valuable therefore as means only - for in no other light does he speak of them - And what else they are valuable as means to he does not tell us, nor on what other account they are valued, for when they are valued as he seems to intimate they may be on another besides this that he has mentioned.

If they are valuable on account of any thing else besides the pleasures of the body they are means to, it must be the pleasures of the mind. But these he has himself reduced to two the two we have just mentioned above - namely the pleasure of thinking that one is fulfulling one's duty which is that we are now considering: and that of the face[?] of truth, or of being satisfied with the evidence of things as they appear to us.

The last mentioned of these pleasures we are to come to by and by. As to the other, it would hardly

Maupertuis




Identifier: | JB/096/130/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

legislation

Folio number

130

Info in main headings field

maupertuis iii

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

31134

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in