<span class="mw-page-title-main">JB/096/036/002</span>

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/036/002

Revision as of 21:49, 10 December 2010 by TimCauser (talk | contribs)
Completed

Click Here To Edit


To be copied human laws to be binding upon mens multitude of penal laws I neither know: no doubt the multiplicity
Consciences, then the multitude of penal of our penal laws is an evil:
but a much greater evil, & which is much more likely to ensnare us, is their want of precision in

"laws would not only be looked upon as enouncing them: s the want of proportion of fixing them: & the want of publicity in promulging them. Let the Legislature
"an impolitic, but would also be a very wicked measure the degree by the ends of punishment: let it explain itself with precision: let it not notify it's will with sufficient
thing, if every such law were a Subject publicity, & there will be nothing impolitic or wicked in our penal laws: no fear <add> of their multitudes
honed ensnare</add>
"snare for the conscience of the Subject". men's consciences.
<add>The mistake of our Author seems
</add>

— He says, what I profess I do not understand. The Author seems to imagine, that the moral sanction has The n The Author saw th or thought he saw some difference
If the Legislature explains in what he calls the natural & municipal Law: this difference <add>lies was this, that his natural law had only the</add>
itself with precision, and notifys it's moral, & not the legal Sanction:
he mistook
not in the ir directory but in sanctionary part: for the rule

will with sufficient publicity, I cannot of conduct for a good man & a good Citizen must be the same: the Characters are inseparable. Here was the
understand, how it can ensnare the Author's first mistake: Because the sanctions
are different he supposed the end to be so too. He saw likewise or thought

conscience of the Subject. I do not mean he saw some difference in the sanctionary
part & the difference is, that his natural law has only the moral

to justify the multiplicity of our penal Laws sanction, not the legal: here again he mistook: & because municipal law has the legal sanction, concluded it could not have the moral: & therefore supposing Conscience to let know not what, & affected only the the moral <add>sanction</add>

97



Identifier: | JB/096/036/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

036

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c96 / c97 / c98 / c99

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be copied" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31040

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in