★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
To be
unintelligible to a man of common
understanding.
Our Author seems to have been led into this inaccurate use of the term law by a servile
imitation of Montesquieu. Montesquieu
had said before him. "Tous les etres on leurs
"lois, la divinite a ses loix, le monde
questionable reading"riel a ses loix, les intelligences superieurs
"a l'homme ont leurs loix, les betes only leurs
"loix, l'homme a ses loix." But then Esprit des loix. livre prem: chap prem:Montesquieu had given a differentdiff
definition of law: he had said, "les loix sont les
This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet
Identifier: | JB/096/002/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
002 |
|||
003 |
|||
collectanea |
4 |
||
recto |
c11 f2 / c12 / c13 / c14 |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
[[notes_public::"to be omitted" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31006 |
||