JB/071/096/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/096/004: Difference between revisions

JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<pb/>
 


<head>16 C</head>
<head>16 C</head>
Line 19: Line 19:
<head>48</head>  
<head>48</head>  


<p><note>Uncertainty <gap/> all this</note> I am sensible how weak the conclusion<lb/>
<p><note>Uncertainty in all this</note> I am sensible how weak the conclusion<lb/>
is that can be drawn from all these observations<lb/>
is that can be drawn from all these observations<lb/>
But when conclusive arguments are not to be had<lb/>
But when conclusive arguments are not to be had<lb/>
Line 28: Line 28:


<p><note>Mischiefs what <gap/> <unclear>inconsiderate</unclear></note> The first question is what the mischiefs are<lb/>
<p><note>Mischiefs what <gap/> <unclear>inconsiderate</unclear></note> The first question is what the mischiefs are<lb/>
which result from an infringement of this <gap/><lb/>
which result from an infringement of this contract<lb/>
without the consent of the other party.</p>
without the consent of the other party.</p>


Line 50: Line 50:
<sic>permitt</sic> the transfer of it?</p>
<sic>permitt</sic> the transfer of it?</p>


<pb/>
 




Line 58: Line 58:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:04, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


16 C

Ins. Offences against Condition — Adultery

every where. But the former if not a certain
proof is a strong presumption of the latter; if in
short the strongest proof which the nature of this
case admitts of. On particular measures a particular
individual may command his countenance
but the people of a whole nation do not enter from into a convention
and agree upon all occasions to command
their countenance.

48

Uncertainty in all this I am sensible how weak the conclusion
is that can be drawn from all these observations
But when conclusive arguments are not to be had
we are forced to take up with the strongest we
can get.

49

Mischiefs what inconsiderate The first question is what the mischiefs are
which result from an infringement of this contract
without the consent of the other party.

The next is what, if any, are the mischiefs
which result from it's being infringed under a
dispensation from the other party in whose favour
it is made. Is there any reason why the non-observance
of it should be punished when the party
in whose favour it is made does not think himself
aggrieved?

50

Facility — it to be permitted In this case there is plainly no direct mischief —
no immediate pain.

51

Is there any thing in the nature of this kind
of property that should make it inexpedient to
permitt the transfer of it?






Identifier: | JB/071/096/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

39-51

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

096

Info in main headings field

adultery

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23499

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in