JB/096/002/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/096/002/004: Difference between revisions

← Older edit
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
awardsmanage, Bureaucrats, giftadmin, staff, Administrators
44,620 edits
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Bots
52,682 edits
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:




<p><note>To be ommitted</note> <del>his</del> <add>the</add> conclusion is consequent.  But the
<p><note>To be omitted</note> <del>his</del> <add>the</add> conclusion is consequent.  But the
<lb/>
<lb/>
same conclusion will not follow from
same conclusion will not follow from
Line 12: Line 12:
<lb/>
<lb/>
different.</p>
different.</p>


<p>Montesquieu had said, &#x2014; "<foreign>L'homme comme
<p>Montesquieu had said, &#x2014; "<foreign>L'homme comme
<lb/>
<lb/>
etre<!-- accent (hat) over the first e --> physique, est ainsi que les <sic>autrescorps</sic><!-- two words, but Bentham has written as one -->.   
être physique, est ainsi que les <sic>autrescorps</sic>.   
<lb/>
<lb/>
gouverne<!-- Bentham has written an accent over last e, but actually none should be written in reality. Should you add the accent and add to list of irregular spellings, or ommit the accent and assume flaw in knowledge or simply a mistake? --> par des loix invariables:&#x2014;
gouverné par des loix invariables: &#x2014;
<lb/>
<lb/>
comme etre<!-- accent (hat) over first e --> intelligent, il viole sans cesse
comme être intelligent, il viole sans cesse
<lb/>
<lb/>
les loix qui Dieu a etablies<!-- forward slash over first e --></foreign>."  Our author
les loix qui Dieu a etablies</foreign>."  Our author
<lb/>
<lb/>
<add>following the general idea of his leader,</add> did not attend to this distinction, but
<add>following the general idea of his leader,</add> did not attend to this distinction, but
Line 31: Line 30:
<lb/>
<lb/>
<sic>assurtains</sic> to a Stone, or a piece of timber.  <add>"The</add></p>
<sic>assurtains</sic> to a Stone, or a piece of timber.  <add>"The</add></p>
<lb/>
 
<head><unclear>17</unclear></head>
<head><unclear>17</unclear></head>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:11, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


To be omitted his the conclusion is consequent. But the
same conclusion will not follow from
our Author's definiton of law: the word
is the same in both, but the Ideas are totally
different.

Montesquieu had said, — "L'homme comme
être physique, est ainsi que les autrescorps.
gouverné par des loix invariables: —
comme être intelligent, il viole sans cesse
les loix qui Dieu a etablies." Our author
following the general idea of his leader, did not attend to this distinction, but
reducing man to the simple State of a Physical
being, has left him no more choice no more free-agency than
assurtains to a Stone, or a piece of timber. "The

17



Identifier: | JB/096/002/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

096

Main Headings

comment on the commentaries

Folio number

002

Info in main headings field

Image

004

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c11 f2 / c12 / c13 / c14

Penner

168

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"to be omitted" [note not in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

31006

Box Contents

Retrieved from "https://transcribe-bentham.ucl.ac.uk/index.php?title=JB/096/002/004&oldid=260009"
UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in