★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
To be omitted his the conclusion is consequent. But the
same conclusion will not follow from
our Author's definiton of law: the word
is the same in both, but the Ideas are totally
different.
Montesquieu had said, — "L'homme comme
être physique, est ainsi que les autrescorps.
gouverné par des loix invariables: —
comme être intelligent, il viole sans cesse
les loix qui Dieu a etablies." Our author
following the general idea of his leader, did not attend to this distinction, but
reducing man to the simple State of a Physical
being, has left him no more choice no more free-agency than
assurtains to a Stone, or a piece of timber. "The
17
Identifier: | JB/096/002/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 96. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
096 |
comment on the commentaries |
||
002 |
|||
004 |
|||
collectanea |
4 |
||
recto |
c11 f2 / c12 / c13 / c14 |
||
168 |
[[watermarks::gr [quartered royal arms motif]]] |
||
[[notes_public::"to be omitted" [note not in bentham's hand]]] |
31006 |
||