★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>§ 4. [ 1 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Necessary and convenient</hi> ] The words <del>in</del> <add>between</add> inverted<lb/> | |||
commas are copied from the Statute 5 & 6 E. 6. c. 25<lb/> | |||
§. 1 relative to Ale-house licences. The use of them<lb/> | |||
is to give to the Board <add>of itself</add> <del>a general power of<lb/> | |||
framing regulations for the regulating the conduct <lb/> | |||
of the several classes of persons in the exercise of their <lb/> | |||
respective occupations</del> the general power of regulation<lb/> | |||
for the reasons <add>already</add> given in the Preliminary Observations.<lb/> | |||
<del>without the necessity of the</del> Whether under<lb/> | |||
favour of this precedent such a power will be<lb/> | |||
thought fit to be conferred is a matter of <hi rend="underline">experiment</hi>: <lb/> | |||
should the experiment <hi rend="underline">fail</hi>, <add>or be deemed <hi rend="underline">unfit for trial</hi>,</add> then will come<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">another</hi> experiment, whether a similar power will<lb/> | |||
be conferred, subject to the sanction of the four principal<lb/> | |||
Judges, according to the precedent established in the case<lb/> | |||
of <hi rend="underline">Hackney-Coach-keepers</hi>, and referred to <add>with approbation</add> by the <hi rend="underline">Committee<lb/> | |||
of Finance</hi>. When the two cases come to be<lb/> | |||
compared, it does not appear to me, that either the<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">demand</hi>, for such a general <add>and <del>unfettered</del> unfettered</add> power, will be found to be<lb/> | |||
less urgent in the cases <hi rend="underline">here</hi> in question than in the<lb/> | |||
case of <hi rend="underline">Alehouse keepers</hi>, nor that the <hi rend="underline">dangers</hi> <del>of</del> to be<lb/> | |||
apprehended from the possession of such a power<lb/> | |||
are greater <add>in the <hi rend="underline">present</hi> case,</add> (considering the checks to which the<lb/> | |||
conduct of the proposed Board will be subject) than<lb/> | |||
<add>as</add> in <hi rend="underline">that</hi> case, where it is given to <del>country</del> <add>meetings of</add> Justices<lb/> | |||
<del>sitting</del> scattered all over the Kingdom, and in<lb/> | |||
situations many of them very remote from the scrutiny<lb/> | |||
of the public eye.<lb/></p><pb/> | |||
| Line 35: | Line 62: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
§ 4. [ 1 ] [ Necessary and convenient ] The words in between inverted
commas are copied from the Statute 5 & 6 E. 6. c. 25
§. 1 relative to Ale-house licences. The use of them
is to give to the Board of itself a general power of
framing regulations for the regulating the conduct
of the several classes of persons in the exercise of their
respective occupations the general power of regulation
for the reasons already given in the Preliminary Observations.
without the necessity of the Whether under
favour of this precedent such a power will be
thought fit to be conferred is a matter of experiment:
should the experiment fail, or be deemed unfit for trial, then will come
another experiment, whether a similar power will
be conferred, subject to the sanction of the four principal
Judges, according to the precedent established in the case
of Hackney-Coach-keepers, and referred to with approbation by the Committee
of Finance. When the two cases come to be
compared, it does not appear to me, that either the
demand, for such a general and unfettered unfettered power, will be found to be
less urgent in the cases here in question than in the
case of Alehouse keepers, nor that the dangers of to be
apprehended from the possession of such a power
are greater in the present case, (considering the checks to which the
conduct of the proposed Board will be subject) than
as in that case, where it is given to country meetings of Justices
sitting scattered all over the Kingdom, and in
situations many of them very remote from the scrutiny
of the public eye.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/150/675/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
675 |
police bill |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d9 / f47 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
|
fr3 |
|||
|
1794 |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"postpone" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
50896 |
||
