★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/677/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/150/677/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Vol now 13 <note>98</note><lb/>Police Bill </p> <p><note>Observations<lb/> IV Penalties &c</note></p> <!-- This whole page has been crossed through --><p> §.11. [ | <!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <unclear>Vol</unclear> now 13 <note>98</note><lb/>Police Bill </p> <p><note>Observations<lb/> IV Penalties &c</note></p> <!-- This whole page has been crossed through --><p> §.11. [i] [<hi rend="underline">Prosecuted for</hi> ... <hi rend="underline">as the penalty for any offence <lb/> ...against this Act.</hi> ] p.18. In the Ale house<lb/> Licencing Act (26 G.2.c.26.§.7.) <add> in the case of a breach of Recognizance</add> a course of proceeding<lb/> <del><add> in case of </add> <del> for a breach of Recognizance</del> is prescribed <note>Recognizance</note> <lb/> as inconsistent as it is <unclear>sparse</unclear>. The <del>G </del> Principal<lb/> <gap/> is to be summoned to attend the <lb/> Quarter Sessions —<hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] (of the Sureties nothing said)</note> there the matter is to be tried by<lb/> a Jury in the way of <hi rend="underline">traverse</hi>, if found against<lb/> him the Recognizance is to be <gap/> into the <lb/> Exchequer (in which case <del> before</del> the <del> <gap/> </del> <add> penalty</add> can not<lb/> <note>Consult ?</note> <lb/> <add> be </add> <gap/> <del>there must</del> but by a tedious procedure<lb/> by <foreign><hi rend="underline"><gap/> <gap/></hi> </foreign> ) : the <add> pecuniary</add> penalty of the recognizance<lb/> <del> payable by the principal <gap/> </del> all this while <lb/> no more than £10, to which is <sic>superadded</sic> — not <lb/> <del> a disability to excuse</del> <add> a perpetual exclusion</add> from the occupation in <lb/> question, but only a suspension <add> for three years</add> of the ( right of <lb/> exercising it. <del> for the </del> But <del> for want</del> without<lb/> any of these expensive formalities <add><del> [+]</del></add> (which, for want of <lb/> an interest adequate to the expense, <del> no <gap/> </del> <lb/> a <gap/> will seldom if ever be disposed to travel<lb/> through) <add> [+] </add> <note>[+] or any formalities at all in so much as a judicial enquiry of any kind</note> the same person may be not only suspended<lb/> but <del> perpetually</del> <add> <del> continually</del> perpetually</add> excluded from the facility<lb/> of exercising the occupation, by <del>the</del> <add> a </add> simple refusal<lb/> <del> of a renewal for</del> <add> to renew</add> his licence. Add to this that<lb/> the <unclear>silence</unclear> observed all this while <del> in reg</del> as to <lb/> the course to be taken with the two £5 Sureties, <lb/> is enough to throw a veil of perplexity on the <lb/>mode of proceeding under this clause. This much <lb/> in the meantime is evident , that were this part of <lb/>the Licensing Act endeavoured to be executed (which <lb/> <add> from the mere inspection of it</add> I <del>would</del> almost venture to <gap/> it scarcely ever is) <lb/> <add> the</add> </p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
+ Cd Vol now 13 98
Police Bill
Observations
IV Penalties &c
§.11. [i] [Prosecuted for ... as the penalty for any offence
...against this Act. ] p.18. In the Ale house
Licencing Act (26 G.2.c.26.§.7.) in the case of a breach of Recognizance a course of proceeding
in case of for a breach of Recognizance is prescribed Recognizance
as inconsistent as it is sparse. The G Principal
is to be summoned to attend the
Quarter Sessions —[+] [+] (of the Sureties nothing said) there the matter is to be tried by
a Jury in the way of traverse, if found against
him the Recognizance is to be into the
Exchequer (in which case before the penalty can not
Consult ?
be there must but by a tedious procedure
by ) : the pecuniary penalty of the recognizance
payable by the principal all this while
no more than £10, to which is superadded — not
a disability to excuse a perpetual exclusion from the occupation in
question, but only a suspension for three years of the ( right of
exercising it. for the But for want without
any of these expensive formalities [+] (which, for want of
an interest adequate to the expense, no
a will seldom if ever be disposed to travel
through) [+] [+] or any formalities at all in so much as a judicial enquiry of any kind the same person may be not only suspended
but perpetually continually perpetually excluded from the facility
of exercising the occupation, by the a simple refusal
of a renewal for to renew his licence. Add to this that
the silence observed all this while in reg as to
the course to be taken with the two £5 Sureties,
is enough to throw a veil of perplexity on the
mode of proceeding under this clause. This much
in the meantime is evident , that were this part of
the Licensing Act endeavoured to be executed (which
from the mere inspection of it I would almost venture to it scarcely ever is)
the
|
Identifier: | JB/150/677/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
677 |
police bill |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d13 / f98 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"not now / consult?" [notes in bentham's hand]]] |
50898 |
||
