JB/064/101/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:17, 2 January 2025

1818. June 27.
Penal Code.Political defamation

24.
Those, in whose
hands the possession
or expectancy of the
power of government
is lodged, will be likely
to make the most
pretensions of this
nature.

25.
In English practice,
in cases of political
defamation, truth
no justification,
but an aggravation.

26.
Uses of the exposure
of the fallacious
grounds of this position.

27.
Suffering to the person
accused much
greater, if the accusation
be true, than
if it be false.

28.
By a true accusation,
much more
intense is the alarm
than by a false one.

29.
But, however correct
the observation,
it is not pertinent
on the occasion
in question.

30.
The suffering to the
wrongee not the only
item to be taken
into the account.

---page break---

31.
The greater the misconduct
of the man
of power, the greater
the amount of suffering
required to be
imposed on him in
the shape of punishment.

32.
False allegations adduced
to show, that
evil can not justly
be imputed to the
man in power.
1. The King can do
no wrong.

33.
2. Suffering borne by
the people at large
is as nothing.

34.
These the only notions,
from which the
position in question
could have originated.

35.
Notion of all perfection
of rulers
possessed in different
degrees by different
persons in power.

36.
But the worthlessness
of the subject
many equally supposed
by all the supporters
of the position
in question.

---page break---

37.
In English practice,
punishment – not
for the offender, but
for the man who
tells of him.

38.
Plea for the suppression
of the liberty
it's dangerousness.

39.
The danger not specified
– subversion of
the Government commonly
stated as the
ultimate result.

40.
Answer. No argument
can be known
from the dangerousness,
unless the dangerousness
of non-suppression
shown be greater
than that of the suppression.

41.
Mischievousness
greater in the case
of suppression than
in that of non-suppression.

42.
Against plea of dangerousness,
counter-proof,
United States.

43.
In no part of U.S.
is political defamation
treated as an
offence.

44.
This the only instance
in which
the experiment compleatly
tried.

Identifier: \| JB/064/101/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 64.
Date_1	1818-06-27	Marginal Summary Numbering	24-44
Box	064	Main Headings	Penal Code
Folio number	101	Info in main headings field	Penal Code
Image	001	Titles
Category	Marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	20455
Box Contents

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/064/101/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<p>1818. June 27.<lb/>
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<head>Penal Code.</head><note>Political defamation</note></p>
+<p>24.<lb/>
+Those, in whose<lb/>
+hands the possession<lb/>
+or expectancy of the<lb/>
+power of government<lb/>
+is lodged, will be likely<lb/>
+to make the most<lb/>
+pretensions of this<lb/>
+nature.</p>
+<p>25.<lb/>
+In English practice,<lb/>
+in cases of political<lb/>
+defamation, truth<lb/>
+no justification,<lb/>
+but an aggravation.</p>
+<p>26.<lb/>
+Uses of the exposure<lb/>
+of the fallacious<lb/>
+grounds of this position.</p>
+<p>27.<lb/>
+Suffering to the person<lb/>
+accused much<lb/>
+greater, if the accusation<lb/>
+be true, than<lb/>
+if it be false.</p>
+<p>28.<lb/>
+By a true accusation,<lb/>
+much more<lb/>
+intense is the alarm<lb/>
+than by a false one.</p>
+<p>29.<lb/>
+But, however correct<lb/>
+the observation,<lb/>
+it is not pertinent<lb/>
+on the occasion<lb/>
+in question.</p>
+<p>30.<lb/>
+The suffering to the<lb/>
+wrongee not the only<lb/>
+item to be taken<lb/>
+into the account.</p>
+<pb/>
+<p>31.<lb/>
+The greater the misconduct<lb/>
+of the man<lb/>
+of power, the greater<lb/>
+the amount of suffering<lb/>
+required to be<lb/>
+imposed on him in<lb/>
+the shape of punishment.</p>
+<p>32.<lb/>
+False allegations adduced<lb/>
+to show, that<lb/>
+evil can not justly<lb/>
+be imputed to the<lb/>
+man in power.<lb/>
+. The King can do<lb/>
+no wrong.</p>
+<p>33.<lb/>
+. Suffering borne by<lb/>
+the people at large<lb/>
+is as nothing.</p>
+<p>34.<lb/>
+These the only notions,<lb/>
+from which the<lb/>
+position in question<lb/>
+could have originated.</p>
+<p>35.<lb/>
+Notion of all perfection<lb/>
+of rulers<lb/>
+possessed in different<lb/>
+degrees by different<lb/>
+persons in power.</p>
+<p>36.<lb/>
+But the worthlessness<lb/>
+of the subject<lb/>
+many equally supposed<lb/>
+by all the supporters<lb/>
+of the position<lb/>
+in question.</p>
+<pb/>
+<p>37.<lb/>
+In English practice,<lb/>
+punishment – not<lb/>
+for the offender, but<lb/>
+for the man who<lb/>
+tells of him.</p>
+<p>38.<lb/>
+Plea for the suppression<lb/>
+of the liberty<lb/>
+it's dangerousness.</p>
+<p>39.<lb/>
+The danger not specified<lb/>
+– subversion of<lb/>
+the Government commonly<lb/>
+stated as the<lb/>
+ultimate result.</p>
+<p>40.<lb/>
+Answer.  No argument<lb/>
+can be known<lb/>
+from the dangerousness,<lb/>
+unless the dangerousness<lb/>
+of <add>non-</add>suppression<lb/>
+shown be greater<lb/>
+than that of the suppression.</p>
+<p>41.<lb/>
+Mischievousness<lb/>
+greater in the case<lb/>
+of suppression than<lb/>
+in that of non-suppression.</p>
+<p>42.<lb/>
+Against plea of dangerousness,<lb/>
+counter-proof,<lb/>
+United States.</p>
+<p>43.<lb/>
+In no part of U.S.<lb/>
+is political defamation<lb/>
+treated as an<lb/>
+offence.</p>
+<p>44.<lb/>
+This the only instance<lb/>
+in which<lb/>
+the experiment compleatly<lb/>
+tried.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/064/101/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:17, 2 January 2025

Navigation

Search