JB/116/474/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/474/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto approved
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head><gap/> Two Letters</head>
<head><del><gap/></del> Two Letters</head>


<note>Preface</note>
<note>Preface</note>


<p>The system of silence or evasion where practicable &#x2014; of false pretence<lb/>
<p>The system of <add>silence or</add> evasion where practicable &#x2014; of false pretence<lb/>
where necessary is the system dictated by over-plenitude of<lb/>
where necessary is the system dictated by over-plenitude of<lb/>
power, labouring under that sort of distress which in that case situation<lb/>
power, labouring under that <add>sort of</add> distress which in that case <add>situation</add><lb/>
sets so light &#x2014; distress of argument.</p>
sets so light &#x2014; distress of argument.</p>


<p>The privilege of silence &#x2014; of silence is a privilege<lb/>
<p>The privilege of silence &#x2014; <del>of silence</del> is a privilege<lb/>
which in the vailing order of things is never can not refused<lb/>
which in the vailing order of things is never <add>can not</add> refused<lb/>
to wrongdoers guilt of any description class or quality. It is the <gap/> ground<lb/>
to wrongdoers <add>guilt</add> of any description <add>class or quality</add>. It is the inheritance <add>ground</add><lb/>
and the stronghold and the invaluable privilege of <gap/> malefactors: can it be defused<lb/>
and the stronghold <add><del>and</del> the invaluable privilege</add> of <del><gap/></del> malefactors: can it be <unclear>defused</unclear><lb/>
to Ministers. It is assessed and exercised by the meanest<lb/>
to Ministers. It is assessed and exercised by the meanest<lb/>
wretches that grovel creep crawl under the law: can it be refused wrested from<lb/>
wretches that grovel <add>creep</add> <add>crawl</add> under the law: can it be refused <add>wrested from</add><lb/>
to those who sit <gap/> and enthroned above the law.</p>
to those who sit enthroned <add><unclear>entrenched</unclear> and</add> above the law.</p>


<p>Uneasiness, the all-embracing expression under which<lb/>
<p>Uneasiness, the all-embracing expression under which<lb/>
Locke has <gap/> principle of action the spring of action in all cases has been well or<lb/>
<del>Locke has <gap/> principle of action</del> <add>the spring of action in all cases</add> has been well or<lb/>
ill reduced by Locke &#x2014; uneasiness, the <gap/> in the side of the most<lb/>
ill reduced by Locke &#x2014; <add>uneasiness,</add> the <gap/> in the side of the most<lb/>
irksome of two opposite uneasinesses lots of uneasiness will in this<lb/>
irksome of two opposite uneasinesses <add>lots of uneasiness</add> will in this<lb/>
as in other instances <gap/> the scale.</p>
as in other instances <gap/> the scale.</p>


<p>In the one scale will be the interests of the community<lb/>
<p>In the one scale will be the interests of the community<lb/>
in respect of the option between the last-made of disparity of<lb/>
in respect of the option between the <unclear>best-made</unclear> of disparity of<lb/>
convicts and the worst: with this disrepute which as it is<lb/>
convicts and the worst: with this disrepute which as it is<lb/>
<gap/> may be supposed to attend on a bac the wrong choice. In<lb/>
<gap/> may be supposed to attend on a bad <add>the wrong</add> choice. In<lb/>
the other will be the danger of giving offence to formidablle persons who<lb/>
the other will be the danger of giving offence to <add>formidable</add> persons who<lb/>
require to be counted with by substituting dispatch to d<lb/>
require to be <unclear>counted</unclear> with by substituting dispatch to <del>d</del><lb/>
procrastination, punctuality to perfidy sincerity to treachery.</p>
procrastination, <add>punctuality to perfidy</add> sincerity to treachery.</p>


<p>The D<gap/> therefore depends upon the probity, the independence<lb/>
<p>The Decision therefore depends upon the probity, the independence<lb/>
the industry, the public spirit of parliamentary<lb/>
the industry, the public spirit of parliamentary<lb/>
men.</p>
men.</p>


<p>No violation of public faith &#x2014; no violation of public duty was ever<lb/>
<p>No violation of public faith &#x2014; no violation of public duty was ever<lb/>
more flagrant &#x2014; never more compleatly destitute of all shadow of pretence: no<lb/>
more flagrant &#x2014; never more compleatly destitute of all <add>shadow of</add> pretence: no<lb/>
criminals, placed above law by situation, were ever more compleatly self-con<gap/><lb/>
criminals, placed above law by situation, were ever more <sic>compleatly</sic> <add>self-</add><unclear>convicted</unclear><lb/>
by necessary silence.</p>
by necessary silence.</p>


Line 46: Line 46:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 17:41, 20 October 2023

Click Here To Edit

Two Letters

Preface

The system of silence or evasion where practicable — of false pretence
where necessary is the system dictated by over-plenitude of
power, labouring under that sort of distress which in that case situation
sets so light — distress of argument.

The privilege of silence — of silence is a privilege
which in the vailing order of things is never can not refused
to wrongdoers guilt of any description class or quality. It is the inheritance ground
and the stronghold and the invaluable privilege of malefactors: can it be defused
to Ministers. It is assessed and exercised by the meanest
wretches that grovel creep crawl under the law: can it be refused wrested from
to those who sit enthroned entrenched and above the law.

Uneasiness, the all-embracing expression under which
Locke has principle of action the spring of action in all cases has been well or
ill reduced by Locke — uneasiness, the in the side of the most
irksome of two opposite uneasinesses lots of uneasiness will in this
as in other instances the scale.

In the one scale will be the interests of the community
in respect of the option between the best-made of disparity of
convicts and the worst: with this disrepute which as it is
may be supposed to attend on a bad the wrong choice. In
the other will be the danger of giving offence to formidable persons who
require to be counted with by substituting dispatch to d
procrastination, punctuality to perfidy sincerity to treachery.

The Decision therefore depends upon the probity, the independence
the industry, the public spirit of parliamentary
men.

No violation of public faith — no violation of public duty was ever
more flagrant — never more compleatly destitute of all shadow of pretence: no
criminals, placed above law by situation, were ever more compleatly self-convicted
by necessary silence.




Identifier: | JB/116/474/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

474

Info in main headings field

two letters

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

38007

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in