JB/070/154/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/070/154/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/154/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/070/154/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
'<head>TABULATION. Attributives Simple X <sic>Qualifi'd</sic> <add>2</add></head>
 
<p><sic>-lar</sic> things, <del>only</del> <add>only</add>; viz: "<hi rend='underline'>of Quantities &amp; Qualities</hi><lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>&amp; of motions &amp; their privation</hi>"</p>
 
<p>"<hi rend='underline'>Inclusive</hi>" again of some particular things only<lb/>
viz: of an Assertion together with the Attribute.</p>
 
<p>[In the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Branch] "Not inclusive" again "of<lb/>
some particular thing" viz: of an assertion<lb/>
So in the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> <hi rend='underline'>Prolis</hi> of the 2<hi rend='superscript'>d</hi> Branch,<lb/>
<del>those which are</del> the attribute "<hi rend='underline'>signification</hi>"<lb/>
predicated of the now-subject <hi rend='underline'>Not-inclusive-of-an-assertion</hi><lb/>
is not simple; <del>for</del> <add>which</add> if it was<lb/>
the division would then stop &amp; there would be<lb/>
no <hi rend='underline'>qualification</hi> but qualified: qualified<lb/>
by being restrained to Quantities &amp; Qualities<lb/>
only in the 1<hi rend='superscript'>st</hi> Prolis: qualified by being<lb/>
restrained to <del>Quantities &amp; Qualities</del> <add>Motions &amp; their privation</add> only in<lb/>
the second.</p>


<p>And here we may observe as a Corollary, that one<lb/>
Attributive by means of different qualifications<lb/>
may composed as many different branches, &amp; in so doing<lb/> <note>have the part of several attributions.</note></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:03, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

'TABULATION. Attributives Simple X Qualifi'd 2

-lar things, only only; viz: "of Quantities & Qualities
& of motions & their privation"

"Inclusive" again of some particular things only
viz: of an Assertion together with the Attribute.

[In the 2d Branch] "Not inclusive" again "of
some particular thing" viz: of an assertion
So in the 1st Prolis of the 2d Branch,
those which are the attribute "signification"
predicated of the now-subject Not-inclusive-of-an-assertion
is not simple; for which if it was
the division would then stop & there would be
no qualification but qualified: qualified
by being restrained to Quantities & Qualities
only in the 1st Prolis: qualified by being
restrained to Quantities & Qualities Motions & their privation only in
the second.

And here we may observe as a Corollary, that one
Attributive by means of different qualifications
may composed as many different branches, & in so doing
have the part of several attributions.



Identifier: | JB/070/154/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 70.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

070

Main Headings

of laws in general

Folio number

154

Info in main headings field

tabulation

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23269

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in