JB/104/292/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/104/292/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/104/292/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/104/292/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/104/292/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1811 Feb. 24<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Fallacies</head></p>
 
<p><del>If <gap/> food of <unclear>forms</unclear>, he is by so much that less for<lb/>
 
to be <gap/>.  This <gap/> from had this imposed been he would<lb/>
 
have <gap/> them.</del> </p>
<p>From the Times 23 Febr<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1811.  House of Lords 22 Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi><lb/>
Lord Grenville</p>
<p>"There was a general idea, and among the worst<lb/>
"signs of the times, that there was a disposition to neglect all forms."</p>
<p>"The Constitution could not be preserved but by attention to forms.<lb/>
"He was old fashioned enough to admire our forms.  This transaction<lb/>
"was against all forms, as the old mode would have been by Proclamation<lb/>
"of the Lord Lieutenant in Council.  Had the Privy<lb/>
"Council been called, there had not be issued a paper <hi rend="underline">co nomine</hi>,<lb/>
"against the Catholics.  All communication had been withheld<lb/>
"from the Regent, and no proof given of any conciliatory endeavours<lb/>
"of the Government."</p>
<p>&#9758; 18 Aug. <del>17</del> <unclear>1819</unclear>.  Quere the correctness of <del>what</del> <add>the argument that</add> follows in<lb/>
this sheet:  or not have its applicability to the purpose.</p>
<p>N.B.  To disapprove of the measure of which disapprobation<lb/>
is here expressed by Lord Grenville, it was not<lb/>
necessary for a man to be a lover of forms.  The departure<lb/>
(if the matter of fact supposed be here) the<lb/>
departure was not a departure <del>of</del> <add>from</add> mere form, but<lb/>
a departure in substance.  <del>The thing to be don</del>  For the<lb/>
purpose of <unclear>controul</unclear> – <unclear>ere</unclear> that the <unclear>controul</unclear> might be so<lb/>
much the stronger – the thing to be desired was that the<lb/>
quantity of responsibility, and thence the number of persons<lb/>
subjected to it should be as great as the nature of<lb/>
the case admitted of.  Under the usage as stated, not<lb/>
only by the Lord Lieutenant's secretary, but the Lord<lb/>
Lieutenant himself was by the use made of his<lb/>
name, held forth as responsible, and not only the<lb/>
Lord Lieutenant, but of the persons composing his Privy<lb/>
Council, all such <del>whom</del> if any whose names were along<lb/>
with his annexed to the Proclamation, or by the Minute<lb/>
of the Council Board, (if <del>any</del> therein any such entry as<lb/>
that in question is <gap/> made) appear to have been<lb/>
present and not dissenting.  On the occasion of the proceeding
<gap/> <gap/> and all those responsible persons.  It exhibits<lb/>
but one responsible<lb/>
person, and<lb/>
he in comparison of<lb/>
many of the others but<lb/>
<gap/><lb/>
the Lord Lieutenant's Secretary, the <unclear>law</unclear> is dependant not in form made, but in substance.  If a form is its <gap/> is the purpose.<lb/>
If be the purpose what it may, the form in question be ill adapted had the sooner this then is changed for a better, the better.  But in the case here in question<lb/>
occasion is taken to give men to understand, that<lb/>
forms in general well or ill adapted are good things,<lb/>
and <add>that be as forms</add> be they ever so ill adapted, it ought not to be<lb/>
changed.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:06, 7 June 2022

Click Here To Edit

1811 Feb. 24
Fallacies

If food of forms, he is by so much that less for
to be . This from had this imposed been he would
have them.

From the Times 23 Febry 1811. House of Lords 22 Feby.
Lord Grenville

"There was a general idea, and among the worst
"signs of the times, that there was a disposition to neglect all forms."

"The Constitution could not be preserved but by attention to forms.
"He was old fashioned enough to admire our forms. This transaction
"was against all forms, as the old mode would have been by Proclamation
"of the Lord Lieutenant in Council. Had the Privy
"Council been called, there had not be issued a paper co nomine,
"against the Catholics. All communication had been withheld
"from the Regent, and no proof given of any conciliatory endeavours
"of the Government."

☞ 18 Aug. 17 1819. Quere the correctness of what the argument that follows in
this sheet: or not have its applicability to the purpose.

N.B. To disapprove of the measure of which disapprobation
is here expressed by Lord Grenville, it was not
necessary for a man to be a lover of forms. The departure
(if the matter of fact supposed be here) the
departure was not a departure of from mere form, but
a departure in substance. The thing to be don For the
purpose of controulere that the controul might be so
much the stronger – the thing to be desired was that the
quantity of responsibility, and thence the number of persons
subjected to it should be as great as the nature of
the case admitted of. Under the usage as stated, not
only by the Lord Lieutenant's secretary, but the Lord
Lieutenant himself was by the use made of his
name, held forth as responsible, and not only the
Lord Lieutenant, but of the persons composing his Privy
Council, all such whom if any whose names were along
with his annexed to the Proclamation, or by the Minute
of the Council Board, (if any therein any such entry as
that in question is made) appear to have been
present and not dissenting. On the occasion of the proceeding and all those responsible persons. It exhibits
but one responsible
person, and
he in comparison of
many of the others but

the Lord Lieutenant's Secretary, the law is dependant not in form made, but in substance. If a form is its is the purpose.
If be the purpose what it may, the form in question be ill adapted had the sooner this then is changed for a better, the better. But in the case here in question
occasion is taken to give men to understand, that
forms in general well or ill adapted are good things,
and that be as forms be they ever so ill adapted, it ought not to be
changed.


Identifier: | JB/104/292/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 104.

Date_1

1811-02-24

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 4 - or 5

Box

104

Main Headings

fallacies

Folio number

292

Info in main headings field

fallacies

Image

001

Titles

from the times 23 feby 1811 house of lords 27 feby lord grenville

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

th 1806

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

andre morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

ID Number

34263

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in