JB/079/094/002

Click Here To Edit

(6
Observations.Inferenda.

it should seem is not much lessen'd when they are told
that under the same penalties they must consent to
the obligation. To a man + + of plain unsophisticated understanding [whose conception of things is not
sophisticated puzzled by technical sophistry discourse], the formality obligation
of giving consent promising of taking a journey in order
to pronounce words of consent [would appear to be
but a hardship] instead of lessening the hardship would
appear to add to it: especially when for the liberty
of pronouncing these words, [a man is finds himself obliged
to pay.] he is made to pay.

To some this what has been said may appear much more than is was necessary;
But the substance of the Law is every where so thick involved
in [so thick] a veil of sophistry, that to hear it at off in any
part can not [but be a work of labour trouble.] be done without
some pains.

thus stands the
Upon this footing stands the use of the Recognizance
with respect to the principal [in the obligation]
With respect to the Sureties it is the case is different. From
persons binding themselves as sureties an express
consent must indeed be taken: for it is only a male free

Identifier: | JB/079/094/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 79.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	079	Main Headings
Folio number	094	Info in main headings field	observations
Image	002	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	b5 / e6 / b7 e7 / e8
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [lion with crown motif]]]
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25536
Box Contents