JB/150/738/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/738/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/738/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/738/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> 6 +D C<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> <note>16</note><lb/> <note>Preliminary Observations</note> Police Revenue Bill</p> <note>Gunpowder &amp;c<lb/>6<lb/><del><gap/></del> <add>Small</add> <gap/> The<lb/><gap/> in this article<lb/>has all the advantages<lb/>of that in Gunpowder<lb/> except what <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> </note> <p> <del> ii The proposed duty in Fire arms <gap/. <gap/> with<lb/> a part only of</del> <add> Of </add> the advantages desirable from <del> that <gap/> <add> the <del><gap/></add> <lb/> proposed duty on Gunpowder a part only adhere to that<lb/> <del><gap/> on <del>Gunpowder</del><add> Fire Arms</add>.  Its operation does not apply<lb/> to the case of the nuisance of Street Fireworks &#x2014;<lb/>But it applies <del>with</del> in a more pointed manner<lb/> to the mischief of <hi rend="underline">poaching</hi>: and in a manner<lb/> equally pointed to the danger of rebellion. <hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> <note>[+] It would be a most<lb/> powerful check, (to say <lb/>the least) to the practice <lb/>of poaching, and <lb/>at the same time <del><gap/></del><lb/> make no small addition <lb/>to the produce of <lb/>the Duty on Game-Licences,<lb/> if it were <lb/>made penal for every <lb/>person not having a <lb/>gun licence to have <lb/>a fowling piece in <lb/>his possession. The <lb/>objection to this is,<lb/> the injury that would<lb/> thereby be done to the <lb/>Gunsmith's trade: a <lb/><gap/> remedy would be <lb/>to appoint for the convenience <lb/>of the regulation<lb/> a distant <lb/>period; suppose seven <lb/>years.</note></p><p><del> Great</del><add> As</add>  Every man has a right <add><del> is among the privileges <gap/> </del> (as has been <add>said)</add> to <lb/> carry arms in his own defence &#x2014; and to keep them<lb/> for the defence of his House and Family <hi rend="superscript">[+2]</hi> <note>[+2] Every man's House is his Castle.</note> Admitted<lb/> But this does not prevent <del>a man's House</del> <add> every man's Castle</add> from being<lb/> taxed: nor <del>to</del> has it been understood to prevent a <lb/>restraint upon the right of <del><gap/></del> keeping <del><gap/></del> <lb/> guns for fowling, though the same gun which kills fowls<lb/> would be equally capable of being <sic>employ'd</sic> upon <lb/> occasion in killing Robbers.  A Gun is a security<lb/>  against Robbers: but a policy of Insurance is a <lb/> still more effective security against loss by fire: and<lb/> as Policies of Insurance <add>against fire</add> have been subjects of taxation,<lb/> so with much more reason may the sort of security<lb/> afforded by fire-arms against Robbers.  The security<lb/> afforded by the Policy of Insurance can not be <del><sic>employ'd</sic></del><lb/> productive of any other effect than the excellent effect<lb/> of indemnifying a man <add> in a acertain degree against the tremendous calamity which</add> <del> against a calamity so terribly <lb/> indefinite in its extent</del> <add> it is <del><gap/></del> employed to obviate:</add> <del> the Gun</del> Fire arms are equally<lb/> applicable to the <add> a variety of </add> most <sic>insedicious</sic> purposes as to <lb/> <del. that for which</del> their own good purpose: as easily employ'd <lb/> <hi rend="underline">by</hi> Robbers and <del> <gap/> <gap/> </del> <add> other Disturbers of Society</add> as <hi rend="underline">against them.</hi></p> <p><note>7.<lb/> This no infringement<lb/> of the Constitutional<lb/> right of Self-Defence</note> </p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
 
 
 
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}

Revision as of 12:55, 18 February 2015

Click Here To Edit

6 +D Cd 16
Preliminary Observations Police Revenue Bill

Gunpowder &c
6
Small The
in this article
has all the advantages
of that in Gunpowder
except what

ii The proposed duty in Fire arms <gap/. with
a part only of
Of the advantages desirable from that the
proposed duty on Gunpowder a part only adhere to that
on Gunpowder
Fire Arms. Its operation does not apply
to the case of the nuisance of Street Fireworks —
But it applies with in a more pointed manner
to the mischief of poaching: and in a manner
equally pointed to the danger of rebellion. [+] [+] It would be a most
powerful check, (to say
the least) to the practice
of poaching, and
at the same time
make no small addition
to the produce of
the Duty on Game-Licences,
if it were
made penal for every
person not having a
gun licence to have
a fowling piece in
his possession. The
objection to this is,
the injury that would
thereby be done to the
Gunsmith's trade: a
remedy would be
to appoint for the convenience
of the regulation
a distant
period; suppose seven
years.

Great As Every man has a right is among the privileges (as has been <add>said) to
carry arms in his own defence — and to keep them
for the defence of his House and Family [+2] [+2] Every man's House is his Castle. Admitted
But this does not prevent a man's House every man's Castle from being
taxed: nor to has it been understood to prevent a
restraint upon the right of keeping
guns for fowling, though the same gun which kills fowls
would be equally capable of being employ'd upon
occasion in killing Robbers. A Gun is a security
against Robbers: but a policy of Insurance is a
still more effective security against loss by fire: and
as Policies of Insurance against fire have been subjects of taxation,
so with much more reason may the sort of security
afforded by fire-arms against Robbers. The security
afforded by the Policy of Insurance can not be employ'd
productive of any other effect than the excellent effect
of indemnifying a man in a acertain degree against the tremendous calamity which against a calamity so terribly
indefinite in its extent
it is employed to obviate: the Gun Fire arms are equally
applicable to the a variety of most insedicious purposes as to
<del. that for which their own good purpose: as easily employ'd
by Robbers and other Disturbers of Society as against them.

7.
This no infringement
of the Constitutional
right of Self-Defence


Identifier: | JB/150/738/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

6-7

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

738

Info in main headings field

police revenue bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b6 / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50959

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in