★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>I † 1</head> | |||
<p><note><gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/> <gap/> <gap/><lb/> | |||
Police Act</note><lb/> | |||
The Police Act, grafted, though by a <del>much</del> superior<lb/> | |||
hand upon the Vagrant, <del>is unavoidably spoilt</del> <add>Act, has received an unavoidable taint from</add><lb/> | |||
<add>betrays</add> by the canker on the stock.</p> | |||
<p><note>5<lb/> | |||
The Police Act<lb/> | |||
grafted to the Vagrant<lb/> | |||
Act, punishes as<lb/> | |||
for repeated acts<lb/> | |||
of delinquency<lb/> | |||
without proof of <gap/></note><lb/> | |||
A <del>more <gap/></del> recent Act, though an infinitely<lb/> | |||
better penned Act than the Vagrant Act, the Police<lb/> | |||
Act, is still liable to the same objection of <hi rend="underline">punishing</hi><lb/> | |||
without proof. <del>The</del> Punishment it <del>takes from</del><lb/> | |||
<del>the Vagrant Act</del> does administer, for it takes it <note>32 Geo. 3. c 53. §.17</note><lb/> | |||
from the Vagrant Act, though <del>fixed</del> <add><del><gap/></del> <add>amended</add></add> by cautions<lb/> | |||
and useful limitations: and it administers it without<lb/> | |||
proof, for it requires the supposed offender to<lb/> | |||
be <del>a</del> <del>reputed a thief</del> <add>deemed a reputed thief</add>, besides being a person<lb/> | |||
of ill fame, unable to give a satisfactory account<lb/> | |||
of himself and being in a certain sort of place<lb/> | |||
with evil intentions of a certain sort, <del>But</del> <add>it requires</add><lb/></p> | |||
I † 1
Police Act
The Police Act, grafted, though by a much superior
hand upon the Vagrant, is unavoidably spoilt Act, has received an unavoidable taint from
betrays by the canker on the stock.
5
The Police Act
grafted to the Vagrant
Act, punishes as
for repeated acts
of delinquency
without proof of
A more recent Act, though an infinitely
better penned Act than the Vagrant Act, the Police
Act, is still liable to the same objection of punishing
without proof. The Punishment it takes from
the Vagrant Act does administer, for it takes it 32 Geo. 3. c 53. §.17
from the Vagrant Act, though fixed <add>amended</add> by cautions
and useful limitations: and it administers it without
proof, for it requires the supposed offender to
be a reputed a thief deemed a reputed thief, besides being a person
of ill fame, unable to give a satisfactory account
of himself and being in a certain sort of place
with evil intentions of a certain sort, But it requires
|
Identifier: | JB/150/419/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
5 |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
419 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
[[page_numbering::d1[?]]] |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"inserendumne?" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
50640 |
||
