★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
utility of <del>each</del> any <add>new</add> measure to which it may<lb/> | utility of <del>each</del> any <add>new</add> measure to which it may<lb/> | ||
be thought fit to apply it, <add>another effect of the Calendar of Delinquency</add> <del>in</del> will be , the <del>check</del><lb/> | be thought fit to apply it, <add>another effect of the Calendar of Delinquency</add> <del>in</del> will be , the <del>check</del><lb/> | ||
<add>operating as a check</add> to <unclear>crude</unclear> and <add>half considered </add> <del>hasty</del> | <add>operating as a check</add> to <unclear>crude</unclear> and <add>half considered </add> <del>hasty</del> <unclear>projects</unclear> in the line of <add>political</add> improvement,<add><del>of supposed improvement</del></add><lb/> | ||
as the practice of keeping regular books<lb/> | as the practice of keeping regular books<lb/> | ||
<add>operates</add> as a check to <del>hasty</del><add>similar</add> enterprises in <add>the line of private industry</add> <del>private | <add>operates</add> as a check to <del>hasty</del><add>similar</add> enterprises in <add>the line of private industry</add> <del>private traders</del><lb/> | ||
By holding up to view the idea of profit and loss<lb/> | By holding up to view the idea of profit and loss<lb/> | ||
in perpetual conjunction, by the continual<lb/> | in perpetual conjunction, by the continual<lb/> | ||
calls it gives to the Statesman to look at both<lb/> | calls it gives to the Statesman to look at both<lb/> | ||
sides of the accounts. it | sides of the accounts. it opposes a powerful <del>check</del><add>corrective</add><lb/> | ||
to these <del>half considered prospects</del><add>partial views</add> in which profit<lb/> | to these <del>half considered prospects</del><add>partial views</add> in which profit<lb/> | ||
alone is taken account of, and loss turned aside<lb/> | alone is taken account of, and loss turned aside<lb/> | ||
from, <del>or not worthy of a thought</del> as if it were<lb/> | from, <del>or not worthy of a thought</del> as if it were<lb/> | ||
not worth thinking of. Abstractedly considered, <del>there</del><lb/> | not worth thinking of. Abstractedly considered, <del>there</del><lb/> | ||
<add>it is easy | <add>it is easy enough to devise measures that no one shape or</add> <note>other would be <sic>serviciable</sic> in the way of Police. But will the advantage in each case afford sufficient payment for the vexation and the expence? On that question depends the eligibility of each measure: and to that question it is only from the Calendar of Delinquency that a substantial and <del>well <gap/></del> perfectly satisfactory answer can be deduced.</note><lb/> | ||
act the question - shall a National Watch<lb/> | |||
or <unclear>Marichampic</unclear> for the guarding of the Roads all<lb/> | |||
or <unclear> | |||
over the Country be instituted?- serve as an example.<lb/> | over the Country be instituted?- serve as an example.<lb/> | ||
Providing <del>from</del><add>upon the ground</add> theory and analogy, without<lb/> | Providing <del>from</del><add>upon the ground</add> theory and analogy, without<lb/> | ||
Line 26: | Line 25: | ||
so should a City or Metropolitan watch.- and if<lb/> | so should a City or Metropolitan watch.- and if<lb/> | ||
a City or Metropolitan watch, so should a National.<lb/> | a City or Metropolitan watch, so should a National.<lb/> | ||
But a National Watch or <hi rend="underline"><unclear> | But a National Watch or <hi rend="underline"><unclear>Marichampic</unclear></hi> will not<lb/> | ||
cost less (say for argument sake than) £40,000 a <lb/> | cost less (say for argument sake than) £40,000 a <lb/> | ||
year. Turning then to the Calendar of Delinquency,<lb/> | year. Turning then to the Calendar of Delinquency,<lb/> | ||
let <del>£40,000</del><add>£20,000</add> a year and more appear to have<lb/> | let <del>£40,000</del><add>£20,000</add> a year and more appear to have<lb/> | ||
here the amount of the propety lost by highway<lb/> | here the amount of the propety lost by highway<lb/> | ||
robbery, within <add>a</add> the same <del>period</del><add>space</add> of time: <add>[+]</add> On the <note><add>[+]</add> and, to clear the case | robbery, within <add>a</add> the same <del>period</del><add>space</add> of time: <add>[+]</add> On the <note><add>[+]</add> and, to clear the case complication <del>let it</del><add>let the year</add> be a year of peace.</note><lb/> | ||
face of this account the <del>balance of advantage</del><add>evidence given by the</add><lb/> | face of this account the <del>balance of advantage</del><add>evidence given by the</add><lb/> | ||
<add>Calendar of Deliquency in relation to the supposed project, of</add> <del>in favour of the supposed</del> a National Marichampic<lb/> | <add>Calendar of Deliquency in relation to the supposed project, of</add> <del>in favour of the supposed</del> a National Marichampic<lb/> |
Affording a practical test as well as index of the
utility of each any new measure to which it may
be thought fit to apply it, another effect of the Calendar of Delinquency in will be , the check
operating as a check to crude and half considered hasty projects in the line of political improvement,of supposed improvement
as the practice of keeping regular books
operates as a check to hastysimilar enterprises in the line of private industry private traders
By holding up to view the idea of profit and loss
in perpetual conjunction, by the continual
calls it gives to the Statesman to look at both
sides of the accounts. it opposes a powerful checkcorrective
to these half considered prospectspartial views in which profit
alone is taken account of, and loss turned aside
from, or not worthy of a thought as if it were
not worth thinking of. Abstractedly considered, there
it is easy enough to devise measures that no one shape or other would be serviciable in the way of Police. But will the advantage in each case afford sufficient payment for the vexation and the expence? On that question depends the eligibility of each measure: and to that question it is only from the Calendar of Delinquency that a substantial and well perfectly satisfactory answer can be deduced.
act the question - shall a National Watch
or Marichampic for the guarding of the Roads all
over the Country be instituted?- serve as an example.
Providing fromupon the ground theory and analogy, without
attending to figures, - if a Parish Watch be necessary
so should a City or Metropolitan watch.- and if
a City or Metropolitan watch, so should a National.
But a National Watch or Marichampic will not
cost less (say for argument sake than) £40,000 a
year. Turning then to the Calendar of Delinquency,
let £40,000£20,000 a year and more appear to have
here the amount of the propety lost by highway
robbery, within a the same periodspace of time: [+] On the [+] and, to clear the case complication let itlet the year be a year of peace.
face of this account the balance of advantageevidence given by the
Calendar of Deliquency in relation to the supposed project, of in favour of the supposed a National Marichampic
will not appear present itself as were favourite
operating very strongly in recommendation of the measure. But
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/150/600/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
107 |
|||
150 |
police bill |
||
600 |
|||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d5 / f174 |
||
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
fr3 |
|||
1794 |
|||
50821 |
|||