JB/150/663/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/663/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
<!-- The first line is not in JB's handwriting. -->
<!-- The first line is not in JB's handwriting. -->


<del>Having stated that it is by an improved Sy</del><lb/>[ 13 ] [ <del>Class <gap/> <add>in</add> <hi rend="underline">no other respect</hi></del> ] [ <hi rend="underline">With or without melting</hi> ] Class 9 p. 8<lb/><del>The classes class here denominated Metal</del><lb/><add>The Instructions went the length of comprizing within</add><lb/><del>Founders is inserted in compliance with the</del><lb/><add>the licencing system every person using or having in his possession</add><lb/><del>Instructions, but I can not help entertaining pretty</del><lb/><add>any such thing as a</add> <lb/><del>strong doubts respecting the possibility of <gap/> <add>practicability of its being</add></del><lb/><hi rend="underline">crucible</hi> or <hi rend="underline">melting pot</hi>.  After exerting my utmost efforts <note>to put this provision <lb/>into what might prove a <lb/>receivable shape, <lb/>I found myself <lb/>in a manner compelled <lb/>to give it <lb/>up.  In every shape <lb/>in which I could put <lb/>it, it still presented <lb/>itself as being at <lb/>the same time inefficiacious <lb/>and  <lb/>intolerable. 1.  <lb/>First as a inefficacy. -</note><lb/><del>returns</del>.<lb/>The chief part of the mischief against <lb/>which this clause is levelled is that which respects<lb/>the metals <add>and metallic mixtures</add> that melt with a <hi rend="underline">small</hi> heat, viz:<lb/><hi rend="underline">Lead, Tin,</hi> <add>and their mixtures,</add> Pewter and Solder.  For <del>their</del> <add>the</add> melting<lb/>of these metals it may very well be that, now<lb/>that melting vessels of all kinds are left free and<lb/>unlicenced, melters in general, <hi rend="underline">dishonest</hi> as well as<lb/>honest, may <hi rend="underline">at present</hi> make use of crucibles or<lb/>other <hi rend="underline">appropriate</hi> melting-pots <del>, but</del> . But for these<lb/>metals a pitch-ladle, a common fire-shovel, <del>any</del><lb/>in a word any one of a variety of other common<lb/>utensils, might be made to serve, nearly<lb/>if not altogether as well as a crucible.  To comprize <del>these ordinary</del> vessels <add>which like these, are in universal use</add> in the list of licenced<lb/>vessels would evidently be impracticable:  and if <lb/>they were not comprized, the provision would as<lb/>to all metallic articles of the above description,<lb/>be inefficacious.<lb/>Next, as to intolerability. - The number of the trades in the exercise of<lb/>which metals come to be melted is <add>on the whole</add> so very great,<lb/>and <del>the number of</del> the persons that would be affected<lb/>by this clause so very numerous, and in many<lb/>instances so opulent and respectable, that the practicability<lb/>of getting it passed seems <del>very</del> <add>highly</add> dubious.<lb/>The <add>great</add> objection would be - not to the licence-duty, <lb/>(<add>the burthen of</add> which at the rate proposed would be inconsiderable)<lb/> <note>but</note>
<del>Having stated that it is by an improved Sy</del><lb/>§ [ 13 ] [ <del>Class <gap/> <hi rend="superscript">th</hi> <hi rend="underline">no other vessel</hi></del> ] [ <hi rend="underline">With or without melting</hi> ] Class 9 p. 8<lb/><!-- The following deleted text added text written between the lines.  The deleted text is given first, followed by the added text. --><del>The classes class here denominated Metal</del><lb/>Founders is inserted in compliance with the<lb/>Instructions, but I can not help entertaining pretty<lb/>strong doubts respecting the possibility of retaining it <add>practicability of its being</add><lb/>retained.</del><lb/><add>The Instructions went the length of comprizing within<lb/>the licencing system every person using or having in his possession<lb/>any such thing as a<lb/><hi rend="underline">crucible</hi> or <hi rend="underline">melting pot</hi>.  After exerting my utmost efforts</add> <note>to put this provision <lb/>into what might prove a <lb/>receivable shape, <lb/>I found myself <lb/>in a manner compelled <lb/>to give it <lb/>up.  In every shape <lb/>in which I could put <lb/>it, it still presented <lb/>itself as being at <lb/>the same time inefficiacious <lb/>and  <lb/>intolerable. 1.  <lb/>First as a inefficacy. -</note><lb/><del></del>.<lb/>The chief part of the mischief against <lb/>which this clause is levelled is that which respects<lb/>the metals <add>and metallic mixtures</add> that melt with a <hi rend="underline">small</hi> heat, viz:<lb/><hi rend="underline">Lead, Tin,</hi> <add>and their mixtures,</add> Pewter and Solder.  For <del>their</del> <add>the</add> melting<lb/>of these metals it may very well be that, now<lb/>that melting vessels of all kinds are left free and<lb/>unlicenced, melters in general, <hi rend="underline">dishonest</hi> as well as<lb/>honest, may <hi rend="underline">at present</hi> make use of crucibles or<lb/>other <hi rend="underline">appropriate</hi> melting-pots <del>, but</del> . But for these<lb/>metals a pitch-ladle, a common fire-shovel, <del>any</del><lb/>in a word any one of a variety of other common<lb/>utensils, might be made to serve, nearly<lb/>if not altogether as well as a crucible.  To comprize <del>these ordinary</del> vessels <add>which like these, are in universal use</add> in the list of licenced<lb/>vessels would evidently be impracticable:  and if <lb/>they were not comprized, the provision would as<lb/>to all metallic articles of the above description,<lb/>be inefficacious.<lb/>Next, as to intolerability. - The number of the trades in the exercise of<lb/>which metals come to be melted is <add>on the whole</add> so very great,<lb/>and <del>the number of</del> the persons that would be affected<lb/>by this clause so very numerous, and in many<lb/>instances so opulent and respectable, that the practicability<lb/>of getting it passed seems <del>very</del> <add>highly</add> dubious.<lb/>The <add>great</add> objection would be - not to the licence-duty, <lb/>(<add>the burthen of</add> which at the rate proposed would be inconsiderable)<lb/> <note>but</note>





Revision as of 13:47, 15 April 2015

Click Here To Edit


Having stated that it is by an improved Sy
§ [ 13 ] [ Class th no other vessel ] [ With or without melting ] Class 9 p. 8
The classes class here denominated Metal
Founders is inserted in compliance with the
Instructions, but I can not help entertaining pretty
strong doubts respecting the possibility of retaining it practicability of its being
retained.
The Instructions went the length of comprizing within
the licencing system every person using or having in his possession
any such thing as a
crucible or melting pot. After exerting my utmost efforts
to put this provision
into what might prove a
receivable shape,
I found myself
in a manner compelled
to give it
up. In every shape
in which I could put
it, it still presented
itself as being at
the same time inefficiacious
and
intolerable. 1.
First as a inefficacy. -

.
The chief part of the mischief against
which this clause is levelled is that which respects
the metals and metallic mixtures that melt with a small heat, viz:
Lead, Tin, and their mixtures, Pewter and Solder. For their the melting
of these metals it may very well be that, now
that melting vessels of all kinds are left free and
unlicenced, melters in general, dishonest as well as
honest, may at present make use of crucibles or
other appropriate melting-pots , but . But for these
metals a pitch-ladle, a common fire-shovel, any
in a word any one of a variety of other common
utensils, might be made to serve, nearly
if not altogether as well as a crucible. To comprize these ordinary vessels which like these, are in universal use in the list of licenced
vessels would evidently be impracticable: and if
they were not comprized, the provision would as
to all metallic articles of the above description,
be inefficacious.
Next, as to intolerability. - The number of the trades in the exercise of
which metals come to be melted is on the whole so very great,
and the number of the persons that would be affected
by this clause so very numerous, and in many
instances so opulent and respectable, that the practicability
of getting it passed seems very highly dubious.
The great objection would be - not to the licence-duty,
(the burthen of which at the rate proposed would be inconsiderable)
but














Identifier: | JB/150/663/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

663

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::f10[?]]]

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50884

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in