★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<!-- The first two paragraphs on this page have been crossed out. --> | <!-- The first two paragraphs on this page have been crossed out. --> | ||
<p>[ 20 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Principal Lumper</hi> ] p. 12 The use of this expression<lb/>is to include <hi rend="underline">females</hi>. <hi rend="underline">Mistress Lumper</hi><lb/>is so awkward <add>a denomination</add> it would hardly be received. Though it<lb/><del>is not</del> <add>does not seem</add> likely that females should be employd in<lb/>person in the loading or unloading of a Ship, yet<lb/>where a <hi rend="underline">Man</hi> has established a business in the<lb/>character of a <hi rend="underline">Master Lumper</hi>, doing nothing<lb/>with his own hands but only providing other<lb/>hands, there seems no incongruity in the supposition, that his <hi rend="underline">Widow</hi> may continue to carry on<lb/>the business<lb/></p><p>[ 21 ] [ <del><hi rend="underline">Common</hi></del> <add>Working</add> <hi rend="underline">Lumper.</hi>] p. 12. I have not yet<lb/>learnt whether it is proposed that the <hi rend="underline">working</hi><lb/>hands should be included in the licencing system: <add>if</add><lb/><del>If</del> not, this Class will of course be to be struck<lb/><add>out</add><lb/></p><p>[ 22 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Class the <del>nineteenth</del></hi> <add>eighteenth</add>.] p. 13. By 12 G. 3. c. 61 | <p>[ 20 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Principal Lumper</hi> ] p. 12 The use of this expression<lb/>is to include <hi rend="underline">females</hi>. <hi rend="underline">Mistress Lumper</hi><lb/>is so awkward <add>a denomination</add> it would hardly be received. Though it<lb/><del>is not</del> <add>does not seem</add> likely that females should be employd in<lb/>person in the loading or unloading of a Ship, yet<lb/>where a <hi rend="underline">Man</hi> has established a business in the<lb/>character of a <hi rend="underline">Master Lumper</hi>, doing nothing<lb/>with his own hands but only providing other<lb/>hands, there seems no incongruity in the supposition,<lb/> that his <hi rend="underline">Widow</hi> may continue to carry on<lb/>the business<lb/></p><p>[ 21 ] [ <del><hi rend="underline">Common</hi></del> <add>Working</add> <hi rend="underline">Lumper.</hi>] p. 12. I have not yet<lb/>learnt whether it is proposed that the <hi rend="underline">working</hi><lb/>hands should be included in the licencing system: <add>if</add><lb/><del>If</del> not, this Class will of course be to be struck<lb/><add>out</add><lb/></p><p>[ 22 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Class the <del>nineteenth</del></hi> <add>eighteenth</add>.] p. 13. By 12 G. 3. c. 61 §. 13. No Gunpowder<lb/><add>is to be made <del>within</del> at all within a district <del>inclu</del> <add>in</add> which <del>includes</del> the London <lb/>Police District is included. -</add> <lb/><note>This and the <hi rend="underline">six</hi> following <lb/>Classes, being a <lb/>set of Classes that, <lb/>taken together, include <lb/>all <del>those</del> such individuals <lb/>as deal in <lb/>articles intended for <lb/>or applicable to warlike <lb/>purposes, have been <lb/>already stated, in the <lb/>General or Preliminary <lb/>Observations, as capable <lb/>of being parted off with <lb/>advantage to a <hi rend="underline">separate</hi> <lb/>Bill: but lest <lb/>it should be thought <lb/>otherwise by those <lb/>who are to judge, I have <lb/>suffered what concerns <lb/>them to stand part of <lb/>the <hi rend="underline">present</hi> Bill. If it <lb/>should be thought proper to omitt them, nothing can be easier than to strike them out. And <lb/>the same observation applies to the three <del>cl</del> next classes, viz: <lb/>the three classes of <hi rend="underline">Lodging-Letters</hi>.<lb/></note></p><p>[ 23 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Class the <del>twentieth</hi></del> <add>nineteenth</add> - <hi rend="underline">Inscription</hi>] <add>p. 13.</add> It might bear a<lb/>question how far it might be eligible upon the whole,<lb/>that the spots, where Gunpowder is kept in quantities,<lb/>should be known to persons without distinction,<lb/>lest <add>ill-disposed</add> persons <del>mischievously disposed might</del> <add>should should at any time</add> avail<lb/>themselves of this information to seize the powder<lb/>or to set fire to it for the purpose of committing<lb/>depredations under favour of the confusion. At any<lb/>rate there can be no harm in giving <add>to</add> the Board of <lb/>Police a discretionary power to <del>have</del> cause the<lb/>inscriptions to be put <del>ap</del> up or not, as they<lb/>think <del>proper best.</del> best.<lb/></p><pb/> | ||
[ 20 ] [ Principal Lumper ] p. 12 The use of this expression
is to include females. Mistress Lumper
is so awkward a denomination it would hardly be received. Though it
is not does not seem likely that females should be employd in
person in the loading or unloading of a Ship, yet
where a Man has established a business in the
character of a Master Lumper, doing nothing
with his own hands but only providing other
hands, there seems no incongruity in the supposition,
that his Widow may continue to carry on
the business
[ 21 ] [ Common Working Lumper.] p. 12. I have not yet
learnt whether it is proposed that the working
hands should be included in the licencing system: if
If not, this Class will of course be to be struck
out
[ 22 ] [ Class the nineteenth eighteenth.] p. 13. By 12 G. 3. c. 61 §. 13. No Gunpowder
is to be made within at all within a district inclu <add>in which includes the London
Police District is included. -</add>
This and the six following
Classes, being a
set of Classes that,
taken together, include
all those such individuals
as deal in
articles intended for
or applicable to warlike
purposes, have been
already stated, in the
General or Preliminary
Observations, as capable
of being parted off with
advantage to a separate
Bill: but lest
it should be thought
otherwise by those
who are to judge, I have
suffered what concerns
them to stand part of
the present Bill. If it
should be thought proper to omitt them, nothing can be easier than to strike them out. And
the same observation applies to the three cl next classes, viz:
the three classes of Lodging-Letters.
[ 23 ] [ Class the twentieth nineteenth - Inscription] p. 13. It might bear a
question how far it might be eligible upon the whole,
that the spots, where Gunpowder is kept in quantities,
should be known to persons without distinction,
lest ill-disposed persons mischievously disposed might should should at any time avail
themselves of this information to seize the powder
or to set fire to it for the purpose of committing
depredations under favour of the confusion. At any
rate there can be no harm in giving to the Board of
Police a discretionary power to have cause the
inscriptions to be put ap up or not, as they
think proper best. best.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/150/665/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
665 |
part i observations police bill |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f16 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"not used" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
50886 |
||
