JB/150/694/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/694/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>§ 1. [ 1 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Forfeited</hi> ]. p. 1. A <add>penalty in the shape of a</add> specific forfeiture of the<lb/>subject matter of the offense, will <del>by running</del> <add>bear a natural</add> in<lb/>proportion to the magnitude of the offender's dealings,<lb/><del>may proportion itself of itself</del> <add>and thence</add> to the magnitude of the<lb/>offence.  Precedents of such specific forfeitures are<lb/>too numerous and <del>notorious</del> <add><del>well known</del> <add>familiar</add> to need quoting or so<lb/>much as referring to.<lb/></p><p>§ 2 [ 1 ] [ <hi rend="underline">No specific proof</hi> ] p. 3.  If specific proof<lb/>applying to every piece of old iron &c were to be required,<lb/>the extent <del>made</del> meant to be given to the forfeiture<lb/><del>could</del> would scarce ever be capable of being<lb/>made to take effect.  Under the safeguards provided in<lb/>this clause, there seems as little danger of an innocent<lb/>person's being convicted, as <del>in any</del> under almost any<lb/>law that can be imagined: and <add><del>besides this</del></add> a subsequent clause<lb/>gives a general power of mitigation.<lb/></p><pb/>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 





Revision as of 01:29, 12 May 2015

Click Here To Edit

§ 1. [ 1 ] [ Forfeited ]. p. 1. A penalty in the shape of a specific forfeiture of the
subject matter of the offense, will by running bear a natural in
proportion to the magnitude of the offender's dealings,
may proportion itself of itself and thence to the magnitude of the
offence. Precedents of such specific forfeitures are
too numerous and notorious well known <add>familiar to need quoting or so
much as referring to.

§ 2 [ 1 ] [ No specific proof ] p. 3. If specific proof
applying to every piece of old iron &c were to be required,
the extent made meant to be given to the forfeiture
could would scarce ever be capable of being
made to take effect. Under the safeguards provided in
this clause, there seems as little danger of an innocent
person's being convicted, as in any under almost any
law that can be imagined: and besides this a subsequent clause
gives a general power of mitigation.


---page break---


















Identifier: | JB/150/694/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

694

Info in main headings field

police revenue bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / f86

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::"not now" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

50915

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in