JB/071/112/003: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/071/112/003: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
OlgaNM (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/112/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/112/003|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>C</head>
<head>Of Family Imposture.</head>
<p>husband. This probability will be weakened only, not destroyed,<lb/>
by the intervention of an Adulterer. It may indeed be perfectly<lb/>
destroyed by facts which prove the impossibility of a conjugal<lb/>
intercourse with the husband; such an absence or indisposition.<lb/>
But such facts are commonly notorious at the time;<lb/>
in particular they must necessarily be known at the time to the<lb/>
party most interested in the case, viz: the Husband: so that if<lb/>
they are not brought to light at the very time, they are never<lb/>
brought to light at all. But the fact of a <hi rend='underline'><foreign>suppositio partus
</foreign></hi><lb/>
may be brought to light at any distance of time by the treachery<lb/>
or repentance of persons privy to the imposture. The<lb/>
former case is therefore is attended with much less mischief<lb/>
that the latter.
</p><pb/>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''





Revision as of 10:48, 27 November 2011

Click Here To Edit C Of Family Imposture.

husband. This probability will be weakened only, not destroyed,
by the intervention of an Adulterer. It may indeed be perfectly
destroyed by facts which prove the impossibility of a conjugal
intercourse with the husband; such an absence or indisposition.
But such facts are commonly notorious at the time;
in particular they must necessarily be known at the time to the
party most interested in the case, viz: the Husband: so that if
they are not brought to light at the very time, they are never
brought to light at all. But the fact of a suppositio partus
may be brought to light at any distance of time by the treachery
or repentance of persons privy to the imposture. The
former case is therefore is attended with much less mischief
that the latter.


---page break---





Identifier: | JB/071/112/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

Image

003

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 / f8

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23515

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in