★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/055/102/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/055/102/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/055/102/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1825. April 2<lb/> | |||
<head>Procedure Code</head></p> | |||
<p>In this case, though the expression by which<lb/> | |||
it will be necessary to designate <add>characterize distinguish</add> the two modes the expression<lb/> | |||
which it will be necessary to employ in designating and<lb/> | |||
distinguishing the two modes, are such as present to individual<lb/> | |||
view nothing but the different nature of the signs<lb/> | |||
yet it is not upon the nature of the signs that the difference<lb/> | |||
in point of eligibility turns, here the circumstances upon<lb/> | |||
which the eligibility turns is – not the nature of the<lb/> | |||
signs but the difference <del><gap/></del> between constant presence and<lb/> | |||
<unclear>mutual</unclear> distance. For where mutual presence has<lb/> | |||
place, <del>the <gap/></del> <add>to</add> signs <del>the presence</del> of the commonest sort<lb/> | |||
signs of the permanent sort may <del><gap/></del> <add>are in <del><gap/></del> use to be made</add> succeed, and<lb/> | |||
accordingly under this <del><gap/></del> Code are <add>constantly</add> made to <del><gap/></del> succeed<lb/> | |||
signs of the <add>everlastingly</add> desirable sort.</p> | |||
<p>In the case of the oral mode therefore the advantages<lb/> | |||
produced by the mutual presence are not waived:<lb/> | |||
whereas <add>by the supposition</add> in the case of the epistolary mode they are <del>and<lb/> | |||
<gap/></del> <add>supposed to</add> be waived. True it is that in point of practicability<lb/> | |||
a letter may be written in the presence of the person to whom it<lb/> | |||
is addressed: nor, <del>in this,</del> where subsequent publicity is contemplated,<lb/> | |||
and <del>the approbation</del> on the part of the individual <add>person</add><lb/> | |||
addressed approbation of the whole tenor of it desired, and<lb/> | |||
<unclear>consented</unclear> to, is this mode of delivery altogether unexemplified:<lb/> | |||
as yet <del>so likewise</del> where the <del><gap/></del> person addressed is deaf,<lb/> | |||
<del>employed:</del> but, generally speaking, this is not the mode of <unclear>presence</unclear><lb/> | |||
commonly employed: so <del><gap/></del> manifest, in point of time<lb/> | |||
and trouble, is the disadvantage.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
1825. April 2
Procedure Code
In this case, though the expression by which
it will be necessary to designate characterize distinguish the two modes the expression
which it will be necessary to employ in designating and
distinguishing the two modes, are such as present to individual
view nothing but the different nature of the signs
yet it is not upon the nature of the signs that the difference
in point of eligibility turns, here the circumstances upon
which the eligibility turns is – not the nature of the
signs but the difference between constant presence and
mutual distance. For where mutual presence has
place, the to signs the presence of the commonest sort
signs of the permanent sort may are in use to be made succeed, and
accordingly under this Code are constantly made to succeed
signs of the everlastingly desirable sort.
In the case of the oral mode therefore the advantages
produced by the mutual presence are not waived:
whereas by the supposition in the case of the epistolary mode they are and
supposed to be waived. True it is that in point of practicability
a letter may be written in the presence of the person to whom it
is addressed: nor, in this, where subsequent publicity is contemplated,
and the approbation on the part of the individual person
addressed approbation of the whole tenor of it desired, and
consented to, is this mode of delivery altogether unexemplified:
as yet so likewise where the person addressed is deaf,
employed: but, generally speaking, this is not the mode of presence
commonly employed: so manifest, in point of time
and trouble, is the disadvantage.
Identifier: | JB/055/102/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-04-02 |
5-6 |
||
055 |
Constitutional Code; Procedure Code |
||
102 |
Procedure Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
E2 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
17823 |
|||