JB/071/166/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/071/166/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
JFoxe (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/166/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/071/166/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<pb/>
 
<head>26 C</head>
 
<head>Frauds relative to the Coin.</head>
 
<p>or to be counterfeit, may cut it in two upon the spot: if it prove<lb/>
bad, or not of due weight, the party tendering it may take it<lb/>
back again but shall bear the loss: if it prove good and of due<lb/>
weight the party to whom it was tendered shall be bound to<lb/>
take it, for what it was coined for. For the method of<lb/>
settling the dispute, see B. II. Of Procedure. Tit. [Suspected Coin]</p>
 
<head>Provisions of Procedure.</head>
 
<head>2.</head>
 
<p><note>Disputes how to be Determined.</note> If the party who tendered it thinks himself aggrieved<lb/>
he may complain to the Judge who shall determine the dispute;<lb/>
and if the piece appears to him to be good and of due weight<lb/>
and that the party who refused it had no reason to suspect<lb/>
it he may order him to pay him who tendered it any sum not<lb/>
exceeding [  ] for his loss of time: and if he should deem<lb/>
it to have been refused out of malice merely to put him who<lb/>
tendered it to inconvenience he may order the aggressor to pay<lb/>
to the party aggrieved any sum not more than thrice the former,<lb/>
over and above compensation for the inconvenience.</p>
 
<head>3.</head>
 
<p><note>The money how to be secured as Evidence.</note> The party who cut the Money may before he delivers it to <add>him</add></p>
 
<pb/>





Revision as of 00:08, 9 March 2012

Click Here To Edit


---page break---

26 C

Frauds relative to the Coin.

or to be counterfeit, may cut it in two upon the spot: if it prove
bad, or not of due weight, the party tendering it may take it
back again but shall bear the loss: if it prove good and of due
weight the party to whom it was tendered shall be bound to
take it, for what it was coined for. For the method of
settling the dispute, see B. II. Of Procedure. Tit. [Suspected Coin]

Provisions of Procedure.

2.

Disputes how to be Determined. If the party who tendered it thinks himself aggrieved
he may complain to the Judge who shall determine the dispute;
and if the piece appears to him to be good and of due weight
and that the party who refused it had no reason to suspect
it he may order him to pay him who tendered it any sum not
exceeding [ ] for his loss of time: and if he should deem
it to have been refused out of malice merely to put him who
tendered it to inconvenience he may order the aggressor to pay
to the party aggrieved any sum not more than thrice the former,
over and above compensation for the inconvenience.

3.

The money how to be secured as Evidence. The party who cut the Money may before he delivers it to him


---page break---




Identifier: | JB/071/166/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 71.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-7

Box

071

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

166

Info in main headings field

frauds relative to the coin

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f25 / f26 / f27 / f28

Penner

Watermarks

[[watermarks::myears [lion with crown motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline fox

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

23569

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in