JB/116/215/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/215/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<head>28 June 1802 (E2) <lb/>N. S. Wales</head>
<head>28 June 1802 (E2) <lb/>N. S. Wales</head>


<p>Covered from head to foot as the whole system is with<lb/> the marks of incapacity and ignorance, it is not <lb/>in the power of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt upon the present occasion<lb/> to take refuge in any such plea. <add>than any more than in any other subterfuge</add> Howsoever it might <lb/>have been in 1786 and 1787, in 1794 at least <add><gap/></add> the<lb/> difference between trust management and interested management, <lb/><del><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi></del> <del>were not altogether untenen</del> nor the performer<lb/> due to the latter upon every ground of solid reason, <add>were</add> altogether<lb/> unperceived by M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt. So great <add>strong</add> and so <lb/>substantial was the difference understood to be nor pretended<lb/> to be understood to be, that it was understood<lb/> or pretended to be understood that a law founding a<lb/> system of management (in the case in question the management<lb/> of Convicts in a Penitentiary establishment here<lb/> at home) on the one principle could not without a<lb/> virtual violation of the respect due to the authority of<lb/> Parliament be made use of and applied to a system <lb/>of management for the same establishment grounded in the<lb/> other principle. <del>When I took</del> <add>Under the original Act, the Act of 1779</add> the Penitentiary system <lb/>stood upon the principle of <add>purely</add> uninterested trust &#x2014; management <lb/><del>The management The</del> system thus grounded had received <lb/>the sanction of Parliament, and, under that sanction, land,<lb/> as to every thing but actual payment of the money had<lb/>  
<p>Covered from head to foot as the whole system is with<lb/> the marks of incapacity and ignorance, it is not <lb/>in the power of M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt upon the present occasion<lb/> to take refuge in any such plea. <add>than any more than in any other subterfuge</add> Howsoever it might <lb/>have been in 1786 and 1787, in 1794 at least <add><gap/></add> the<lb/> difference between trust management and interested management, <lb/><del><hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi></del> <del>were not altogether untenen</del> nor the performer<lb/> due to the latter upon every ground of solid reason, <add>were</add> altogether<lb/> unperceived by M<hi rend='superscript'>r</hi> Pitt. So great <add>strong</add> and so <lb/>substantial was the difference understood to be nor pretended<lb/> to be understood to be, that it was understood<lb/> or pretended to be understood that a law founding a<lb/> system of management (in the case in question the management<lb/> of Convicts in a Penitentiary establishment here<lb/> at home) on the one principle could not without a<lb/> virtual violation of the respect due to the authority of<lb/> Parliament be made use of and applied to a system <lb/>of management for the same establishment grounded in the<lb/> other principle. <del>When I took</del> <add>Under the original Act, the Act of 1779</add> the Penitentiary system <lb/>stood upon the principle of <add>purely</add> uninterested trust &#x2014; management <lb/><del>The management The</del> system thus grounded had received <lb/>the sanction of Parliament, and, under that sanction, land,<lb/> as to every thing but actual payment of the money had<lb/> been purchased for it. When I came forward with <del>my</del> <add>that</add> offer<lb/> which after years taken for consideration was accepted </p> 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<p>Give me that land (said I) and I will do the business<lb/> so much cheaper and better as my plan shows. This <del>you have</del> <add>may</add> <lb/>  <add>First to be done was, to save <add>further</add> loss of time. This you have </add> power to do at any time: at least to take possession of the land. <hi rend='superscript'>[+]</hi> <lb/><note><hi rend='superscript'><lb/>[+]</hi> at least with the concurrence of the manager appointed under the former system, a concurrence which I have reason to expect will not be issued:</note><lb/> If, for the purpose of <del>comple</del> giving a compleat sanction to<lb/> the business you look upon it as necessary to apply to<lb/> Parliament, this necessity, <del>one</del> need be no obstacle. If (what <lb/>  <add>is</add>
</p>





Revision as of 20:26, 12 April 2013

Click Here To Edit

28 June 1802 (E2)
N. S. Wales

Covered from head to foot as the whole system is with
the marks of incapacity and ignorance, it is not
in the power of Mr Pitt upon the present occasion
to take refuge in any such plea. than any more than in any other subterfuge Howsoever it might
have been in 1786 and 1787, in 1794 at least the
difference between trust management and interested management,
[+] were not altogether untenen nor the performer
due to the latter upon every ground of solid reason, were altogether
unperceived by Mr Pitt. So great strong and so
substantial was the difference understood to be nor pretended
to be understood to be, that it was understood
or pretended to be understood that a law founding a
system of management (in the case in question the management
of Convicts in a Penitentiary establishment here
at home) on the one principle could not without a
virtual violation of the respect due to the authority of
Parliament be made use of and applied to a system
of management for the same establishment grounded in the
other principle. When I took Under the original Act, the Act of 1779 the Penitentiary system
stood upon the principle of purely uninterested trust — management
The management The system thus grounded had received
the sanction of Parliament, and, under that sanction, land,
as to every thing but actual payment of the money had
been purchased for it. When I came forward with my that offer
which after years taken for consideration was accepted

Give me that land (said I) and I will do the business
so much cheaper and better as my plan shows. This you have may
First to be done was, to save <add>further loss of time. This you have </add> power to do at any time: at least to take possession of the land. [+]

[+]
at least with the concurrence of the manager appointed under the former system, a concurrence which I have reason to expect will not be issued:

If, for the purpose of comple giving a compleat sanction to
the business you look upon it as necessary to apply to
Parliament, this necessity, one need be no obstacle. If (what
is




Identifier: | JB/116/215/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-06-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

215

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1 / f44

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[monogram] 1800]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

37748

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in